Linux-Kernel Archive
By Author

Starting: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 00:01:27 EST
Ending: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:34:13 EST

• Aaron Laffin
  • using open() on a looping symlink with O_CREAT set fails incorrectly. (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:06:14 EST)
• Aaron Lehmann
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:56:33 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:01:58 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:08:43 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:34:03 EST)
  • 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:46:16 EST)
  • Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 20:05:39 EST)
• Aaron Tiensivu
  • [2.4.1-p10] Multilink PPP crash fix (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:59:20 EST)
  • [2.4.1-p8 More MPPP oops] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 04:48:09 EST)
  • [2.4.1-pre8] MPP related OPPS (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:58:23 EST)
• Abramo Bagnara
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:14:08 EST)
• Adam Fritzler
  • Re: Problem with Madge Tokenring (abyss.o) in 2.4.1-pre10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:14:38 EST)
  • Re: Probably Off-topic Question... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:32:06 EST)
• Adam J. Richter
  • [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/include/linux/acpi.h broke acpid compilation (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 03:23:19 EST)
  • [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/drivers/usb/serial/mct_u232.c usb_device_id table broken by new format (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:04:30 EST)
• Adam Lackorzynski
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:18:34 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:14:49 EST)
  • [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:12:07 EST)
• Adam Scislowicz
  • Failure to mount INITRD on a 1GB or 2GB machine w/ 4GB bigmem enabled. (2.4.0)] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:14:47 EST)
• Admin Mailing Lists
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:20:49 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:23:40 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:50:19 EST)
• adrian
  • Re: Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:56:19 EST)
• Adrian Glaubitz
  • Bug in IA64 bootsector code ? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:16:36 EST)
• Alan Chandler
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:51:12 EST)
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:55:13 EST)
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:45:10 EST)
  • [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:14:04 EST)
• Alan Cox
  • Linux 2.4.0-ac10 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:33:11 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:57:32 EST)
  • Patches (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 01:34:02 EST)
• Alan Olsen
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:58:39 EST)
  • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:01:14 EST)
  • Probably Off-topic Question... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:40:50 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 02:20:34 EST)
• Alan Schmitt
  • kapm-idled and cpu heating ... (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:51:41 EST)
• Albert Cranford
  • 2.4.1-pre9 fails to compile drm r128 as module (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:49:27 EST)
• Albert D. Cahalan
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 02:27:24 EST)
  • Re: Coding Style (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:46:42 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:12:48 EST)
• Alberto Bertogli
  • Re: Linux MegaRAID Driver Version 1.14b Release (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:41:43 EST)
• Alessandro Suardi
  • xircom_tulip_cb reports wrong stats in /proc/net/dev (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:59:35 EST)
• Alex Deucher
  • Re: APM, ACPI, WOL, Oh My! (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:54:31 EST)
  • APM, ACPI, WOL, Oh My! (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:11:15 EST)
• Allen Bolderoff
  • "Received disconnect: Command terminated on signal 13." when logging in via ssh (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 02:19:38 EST)
• Anders Karlsson
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:52:31 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:16:11 EST)
  • 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:48:14 EST)
• Anders Peter Fugmann
  • Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:42:27 EST)
• andersg@0x63.nu
  • lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:41:06 EST)
• Andi Kleen
  • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:10:11 EST)
  • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:08:03 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:58:23 EST)
  • Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:28:51 EST)
  • Re: How come top and /proc/meminfo on 2.4.0 says 0K shared? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:46:08 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] sched_test_yield benchmark (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:52:31 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:08:25 EST)
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:48:21 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:46:10 EST)
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:08:52 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:51:01 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:45:13 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:57:11 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 04:34:14 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:21:14 EST)
  • Re: IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:01:26 EST)
  • Re: IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:35:47 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:01:25 EST)
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:34:05 EST)
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:37:43 EST)
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:13:23 EST)
• Andre Hedrick
  • Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:26:40 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:27:02 EST)
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:28:34 EST)
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 15:49:40 EST)
  • Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:44:30 EST)
  • Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:36:25 EST)
  • Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:40:19 EST)
  • Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:06:10 EST)
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:57:07 EST)
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Thu Jan 20 2011 - 12:51:03 EST)
  • Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 03:45:33 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 05:55:57 EST)
  • RE: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (fwd) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:30:04 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:40:33 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 05:01:45 EST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:45:13 EST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:14:02 EST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:32:44 EST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:44:06 EST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:40:13 EST)
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:11:15 EST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:06:38 EST)
  • Re: ServerWorks IDE in 2.4.0-ac4 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:48:18 EST)
• Andrea Arcangeli
  • Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:27:26 EST)
  • Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:09:36 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:20:21 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:05:21 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:56:15 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:30:23 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:23:20 EST)
  • Re: lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:25:53 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:13:27 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:54:00 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:25:52 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd) (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:27:18 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:30:41 EST)
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:35:02 EST)
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:26:16 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:16:29 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:16:51 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:54:32 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:14:11 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:04:28 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:44:32 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:24:41 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:38:02 EST)
  • Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:05:10 EST)
  • Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:33:34 EST)
• Andreas Dilger
  • Re: Under 2.4.0 I can mount same partition twice. (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:13:44 EST)
  • Re: Marking sectors on IDE drives as bad (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:28:37 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 23:47:51 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 05:01:01 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:39:56 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:23:55 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:43:49 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:19:28 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:12:22 EST)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:24:39 EST)
  • Re: super_operations in -pre7 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:59:37 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:18:26 EST)
  • Re: Name of SCSI Device (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:13:24 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:11:21 EST)
• Andreas Franck
  • Re: IDE-Floppy and devfs (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:56:46 EST)
• Andreas Schwab
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 05:18:56 EST)
• Andres Salomon
  • [PATCH] maestro3 oops + fix (for ac9!) (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:29:25 EST)
• Andrew
  • kernel 2.4, iproute2 and routing rules that refuse to match (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:51:28 EST)
• Andrew Clausen
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:35:24 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:08:50 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:28:27 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:30:54 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:47:42 EST)
  • Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:17:22 EST)
• Andrew Morton
  • Re: Network hang with 2.4.1-pre9 and 3c59x (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:40:26 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:52:37 EST)
  • Re: more on scheduler benchmarks (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:45:58 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:07:46 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre9 Oops (was Re: 2.4.1pre8 Oops) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:43:58 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 Oops (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:36:42 EST)
  • Re: console spin_lock (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:42:59 EST)
  • Re: console spin_lock (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:49:37 EST)
• Andrew Scott
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:55:29 EST)
• Andrey Savochkin
  • Re: eepro100 error messages (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 01:45:05 EST)
  • Re: eepro cmd_wait (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:03:09 EST)
  • Re: eepro cmd_wait (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:17:31 EST)
• Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:46:07 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:55:34 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:42:25 EST)
  • Re: Getting the number of 512-byte sectors? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 20:31:04 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:36:04 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:50:49 EST)
• Andris Pavenis
  • Re: devfs breakage in 2.4.0 release (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 03:25:50 EST)
• André Dahlqvist
  • [PATCH] Add help text for ATI Radeon (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 22:54:35 EST)
  • [PATCH] Update URL for hdparm in Configure.help (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 22:41:05 EST)
  • Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:55:58 EST)
• Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac10 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:06:58 EST)
• Andy Galasso
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 03:39:50 EST)
• antirez
  • ICMP spoofing protection: Is this code sane? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:19:54 EST)
• Anton Altaparmakov
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:29:17 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:56:40 EST)
  • Re: Getting the number of 512-byte sectors? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:05:07 EST)
  • Getting the number of 512-byte sectors? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 11:16:31 EST)
  • Re: Coding Style (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:32:51 EST)
  • [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac9: NTFS cleanup & assorted bugfixes (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:11:06 EST)
• Anton Blanchard
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:43:01 EST)
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:36:47 EST)
• Antony Suter
  • [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:13:25 EST)
• apark@cdf.toronto.edu
  • /proc/PID/stat format (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:26:46 EST)
• aprasad@in.ibm.com
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:13:09 EST)
• archan
  • cddrive problem in Toshiba Laptop with 2.4.0-test11 kernel (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:24:24 EST)
  • cddrive problem in Toshiba Laptop with 2.4.0-test11 kernel (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 02:05:35 EST)
• Arjan van de Ven
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:27:48 EST)
• Armin Schindler
  • lock_kernel() ? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:54:12 EST)
• Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  • Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre9 does not compile on r128.c (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:04:47 EST)
  • Re: -ac10 compile error (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:14:53 EST)
• bandit2@iname.com
  • Overriding BIOS settings with kernel 2.4.0 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:03:54 EST)
• Barry K. Nathan
  • Re: 2.4 cpu usage... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:37:32 EST)
  • Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:27:17 EST)
  • 2.4.x: CONFIG_IDEDMA_NEW_DRIVE_LISTINGS paradox/doc. bug (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:27:14 EST)
  • Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:53:57 EST)
• Bart Dorsey
  • Problem with Madge Tokenring (abyss.o) in 2.4.1-pre10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:42:34 EST)
• Ben Ford
  • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:53:04 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:42:51 EST)
• Ben Greear
  • Re: changing mac address of eth alias (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:38:56 EST)
  • [PATCH] 802.1Q VLAN for Linux (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 23:33:40 EST)
• Ben Mansell
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:02:02 EST)
• Bernd Eckenfels
  • Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:50:27 EST)
  • Re: the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch] (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:32:34 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:18:23 EST)
  • the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch] (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 07:07:45 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 05:53:25 EST)
• Bernd Kaindl
  • Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 07:20:22 EST)
• Bernd Schmidt
  • Re: Proper OOPS report (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:32:08 EST)
• bert hubert
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:52:26 EST)
  • Re: eepro100 error messages (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:35:59 EST)
  • Re: a linux qos mailing list (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:24:13 EST)
• Bill Crawford
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:32:24 EST)
• Bill Hartner
  • Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:07:21 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:23:05 EST)
  • sched_test_yield benchmark (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:30:55 EST)
• Bill Nottingham
  • Re: Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:53:10 EST)
  • Re: Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:24:10 EST)
• Billy Harvey
  • -ac10 compile error (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:53:06 EST)
• Bjorn Wesen
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:39:20 EST)
• Bob Frey
  • Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:32:43 EST)
  • Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:41:30 EST)
• Bobo Rajec
  • 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:08:38 EST)
• Boris Dragovic
  • Re: Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:05:46 EST)
• Boszormenyi Zoltan
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:28:27 EST)
  • 2.4.0-vmpatch-15.1 still no go (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:36:07 EST)
• Brad Felmey
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 23:24:54 EST)
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:54:03 EST)
• Brian Gerst
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:32:31 EST)
  • Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to 2.4.1pre8) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:34:03 EST)
  • Re: SCSI partitions (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:33:40 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:04:57 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:31:29 EST)
• Brian Pomerantz
  • Re: kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:17:19 EST)
• Bryan Henderson
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:30:55 EST)
• bsuparna@in.ibm.com
  • Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:35:41 EST)
  • [ANNOUNCE] Dynamic Probes 1.3 released (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 01:49:25 EST)
  • Common Abstraction of Notification & Completion Handling Mechanisms - observations and potential RFC (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:34:43 EST)
• Burton Windle
  • VM: Undead swap messages at shutdown (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 14:23:41 EST)
• C Sanjayan Rosenmund
  • Modules not being found with 2.4.0 on a 486 based box (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:23:57 EST)
• Cacophonix
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:19:08 EST)
• Carles Pina i Estany
  • RE: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:05:49 EST)
  • Name of SCSI Device (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:17:53 EST)
• Carlo Scarfoglio
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre patches do no compile (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:18:44 EST)
  • 2.4.1-pre patches do no compile (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:51:42 EST)
• Chad Miller
  • Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:16:23 EST)
  • G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...) (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:55:46 EST)
  • Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate... (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:22:51 EST)
• Chandler, Alan
  • RE:[preview] VIA IDE driver v3.11 with vt82c686b UDMA100 support (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:38:00 EST)
• Chmouel Boudjnah
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:05:36 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:18:11 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:50:48 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:40:45 EST)
• Chris Chabot
  • Interface statistics for Bonding bug in 2.4 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:56:44 EST)
• Chris Jones
  • Re: problem mounting root under 2.4.0 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:20:22 EST)
  • problem mounting root under 2.4.0 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:40:41 EST)
• Chris K Cockrum
  • Module Profiling Problem (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:44:28 EST)
• Chris Mason
  • Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:09:53 EST)
  • Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:57:26 EST)
  • Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:18:43 EST)
  • Re: More information on reiserfs bug (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:12:23 EST)
• Chris Rankin
  • [PATCH] : Sound module locking - uart401 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 04:00:27 EST)
• Chris Wedgwood
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:34:33 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:02:26 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 02:07:27 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:31:39 EST)
• Christian Gennerat
  • Re: PCMCIA problem loading ide-floppy from ide_cs (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:59:50 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Fixed (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:34:31 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:10:23 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:05:13 EST)
• Christoph Hellwig
  • Re: Looking for a Linux expert--great job opportunity (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:04:28 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:05:15 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:57:58 EST)
  • Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:25:03 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:50:23 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:53:33 EST)
• Christoph Rohland
  • Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:44:44 EST)
  • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:23:41 EST)
  • [patch2] swapfs fixes against ac9 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:31:05 EST)
  • [patch] swapfs fixes against and comments on ac9 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:56:27 EST)
  • [Patch2] shmem fixes for 2.4.1-pre7 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:20:44 EST)
  • [Patch] shmem fixes for 2.4.1-pre7 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:16:18 EST)
  • Re: Bug in swapfs (2.4.0-ac9) (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:50:09 EST)
• Christopher Friesen
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:05:59 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:54:23 EST)
• Claudio Martins
  • Adaptec SCSI RAID ASR-2100S (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:09:53 EST)
• Cort Dougan
  • Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:41:36 EST)
• Craig Ruff
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:07:09 EST)
• D.W.Howells
  • What happened to merge_segments()? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:05:13 EST)
• Dag Bakke
  • Inconsistent cache size reporting.? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 03:26:27 EST)
• Dan Aloni
  • [PATCH 2.4] fs/super.c - paratition boundary checking before mount (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:35:46 EST)
• Dan Graham
  • Under 2.4.0 I can mount same partition twice. (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:38:39 EST)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:17:41 EST)
• Dan Hopper
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:12:29 EST)
• Dan Kegel
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:51:31 EST)
• Dan Maas
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:35:12 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 04:41:32 EST)
• Daniel Mehrmnann
  • Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:34:05 EST)
  • Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:24:46 EST)
• Daniel Stodden
  • [OOPS] (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:14:16 EST)
• Daniel Stone
  • Re: Firewall netlink question... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:33:48 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:29:34 EST)
  • Re: Firewall netlink question... (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 06:28:41 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:08:00 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:32:15 EST)
• Daniels, Andrew
  • 2.2.18 / Oracle 8.1.6 or 8.1.7 any known problems? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:50:09 EST)
• Dave Cinege
  • Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:21:25 EST)
  • Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:39:46 EST)
  • md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:34:07 EST)
• Dave Dykstra
  • Re: Linux 2.2.16 through 2.2.18preX TCP hang bug triggered by rsync (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:51:19 EST)
  • Linux 2.2.16 through 2.2.18preX TCP hang bug triggered by rsync (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:42:14 EST)
• david
  • need help raid and 2.4.0 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:27:42 EST)
  • test only do not read (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:16:13 EST)
• David Balazic
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:55:49 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:01:29 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 05:14:59 EST)
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:04:41 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:56:53 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:48:37 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:21:06 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:04:02 EST)
  • devices.txt missing some info about OSS devices (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:10:32 EST)
• David Benfell
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:16:53 EST)
• David Brownell
  • Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimentalpatch] UHCI updates) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:43:51 EST)
• David D.W. Downey
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:46:10 EST)
  • Re: boot.img & initrd.img (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:42:41 EST)
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:39:38 EST)
  • VIA chipset discussion (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:02:17 EST)
• David Ford
  • Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:36:21 EST)
  • Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:13:48 EST)
  • NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:48:16 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:08:39 EST)
  • Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:02:27 EST)
  • Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:47:35 EST)
  • Re: Coding Style (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:09:09 EST)
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 23:35:37 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:56:30 EST)
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:53:32 EST)
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:46:40 EST)
  • Re: [OT]: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:17:48 EST)
  • 2.4.0-ac6, 'rm' stalls in wait_on_buffer (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:06:50 EST)
• David L. Parsley
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:46:03 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:05:06 EST)
• David Lang
  • SCSI raid controllers (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:02:26 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:01:23 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:27:58 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:06:37 EST)
  • Re: SCSI partitions (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:39:04 EST)
• David Luyer
  • PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 23:54:56 EST)
  • Patch: Pass parameters to xirc2ps_cs via kernel command line (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:28:21 EST)
• David Riley
  • Re: [PATCH] via82cxxx_audio (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 03:05:38 EST)
• David Santinoli
  • Re: Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:38:47 EST)
  • Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:54:17 EST)
• David Schwartz
  • RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:29:29 EST)
  • RE: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:29:29 EST)
  • RE: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 22:27:19 EST)
  • RE: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:20:29 EST)
• David Weinehall
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:55:17 EST)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 07:33:36 EST)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:15:56 EST)
• David Weis
  • changing mac address of eth alias (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:37:38 EST)
• David Woodhouse
  • Re: bootp starts before network device? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:42:51 EST)
  • Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:34:09 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:21:28 EST)
  • Re: Ibcs2 or abi for kernel 2.4 (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 17:10:15 EST)
  • Re: oops (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:18:52 EST)
  • Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 04:30:50 EST)
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:40:56 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:02:07 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:38:47 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:58:11 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:06:46 EST)
• David Wragg
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:01:29 EST)
  • Re: ioremap_nocache problem? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:50:20 EST)
  • Re: limit on number of kmapped pages (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:35:12 EST)
  • limit on number of kmapped pages (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:56:00 EST)
• Davide Libenzi
  • Re: more on scheduler benchmarks (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:37:34 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:58:50 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:24:41 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:03:06 EST)
  • Re: sched_test_yield benchmark (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:35:55 EST)
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:38:30 EST)
• dean gaudet
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:20:08 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:35:27 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:25:36 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:16:05 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:03:02 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:46:49 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:38:23 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:27:40 EST)
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:39:04 EST)
  • Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:03:42 EST)
• Derek Wildstar
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:04:08 EST)
  • Re: (2.4.0->2.4.1-pre8) config problem with PCMCIA causing link error (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:36:57 EST)
  • (2.4.0->2.4.1-pre8) config problem with PCMCIA causing link error (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:57:03 EST)
• dmeyer@dmeyer.net
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:54:31 EST)
  • Documenting stat(2) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 02:05:28 EST)
• Dominik Kubla
  • APIC errors (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:14:32 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:40:09 EST)
• Donald Becker
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: Q: natsemi.c spinlocks (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:06:11 EST)
• Doug McNaught
  • Re: Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:54:11 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:22:11 EST)
• Douglas Gilbert
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:41:18 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:45:05 EST)
• Dr. Kelsey Hudson
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:26:05 EST)
  • Re: APIC errors (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:54:27 EST)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:08:42 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:05:26 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:51:06 EST)
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:30:34 EST)
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:01:12 EST)
• Duncan Laurie
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:46:24 EST)
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 23:54:23 EST)
  • RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 20:39:46 EST)
• Dunlap, Randy
  • RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 20:52:23 EST)
  • RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:01:51 EST)
  • RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:26:50 EST)
• Dylan Griffiths
  • PS/2 mouse problems in Linux 2.4.0 and 2.2.17 on KT133 chipset based motherboards. (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:09:26 EST)
• ebi4
  • 2.4.1-pre8 video/ohci1394 compile problem (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:52:40 EST)
• Ed Tomlinson
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:20:45 EST)
  • Re: [reiserfs-list] Don't mix reiserfs and RAID5 in linux-2.4.1-pre8, severe corruption (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:59:45 EST)
• ed@alcpress.com
  • SCSI partitions (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:10:41 EST)
• Eddie Williams
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:24:49 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:53:47 EST)
• Edgar Toernig
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:58:10 EST)
• Edward
  • Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:36:30 EST)
  • Don't mix reiserfs and RAID5 in linux-2.4.1-pre8, severe corruption (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:27:02 EST)
• egger@suse.de
  • Re: Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 07:54:34 EST)
  • Re: Hang when booting 2.4.0/2.4.1-pre8 on Compaq 1850R with SMART 3200 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:39:21 EST)
• Eli Carter
  • Re: [PATCH] pcnet32.c ARM support & AM79C973 improvements (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:37:35 EST)
  • [PATCH] pcnet32.c ARM support & AM79C973 improvements (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:46:13 EST)
  • Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:37:17 EST)
  • lance.c @ 100Mbit (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:27:43 EST)
• Eric Lammerts
  • Re: Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 05:55:24 EST)
• Eric S. Raymond
  • Documenting stat(2) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:28:12 EST)
• Eric W. Biederman
  • Re: limit on number of kmapped pages (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:23:46 EST)
  • Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux. (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:18:25 EST)
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:35:56 EST)
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:34:39 EST)
• Erik Mouw
  • Re: /proc/PID/stat format (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:43:49 EST)
• Eugenio Jimenez
  • ACPI slows down the system (2.4.0) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:00:26 EST)
• f5ibh
  • Re: display problem with matroxfb (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:34:51 EST)
  • Re: display problem with matroxfb (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:11:51 EST)
  • display problem with matroxfb (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 09:48:44 EST)
• Felix von Leitner
  • Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:36:49 EST)
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:56:35 EST)
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:40:13 EST)
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:27:56 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:20:23 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:47:37 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 05:40:18 EST)
• Florent Cueto
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:23:28 EST)
• Florin Andrei
  • Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:15:51 EST)
• Frank Davis
  • 2.4.0-ac10 patching issue (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:18:59 EST)
• Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: Freeze: atyfb & XFree4.0.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:20:07 EST)
• Georg Nikodym
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:44:37 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:14:17 EST)
• george anzinger
  • Re: Coding Style (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 03:24:19 EST)
• Gerd Knorr
  • Re: Problems with Askey TView CPH061 grabber board under bttv (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:44:25 EST)
• Gerhard Mack
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:43:15 EST)
  • Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:21:15 EST)
• Giacomo Catenazzi
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:55:40 EST)
• Giuliano Pochini
  • Re: blk-13B (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:05:13 EST)
• Glenn McGrath
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:01:33 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:16:49 EST)
• gmo@broadcom.com
  • RE: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:59:28 EST)
• Goswin Brederlow
  • Re: the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch] (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:09:44 EST)
  • Re: the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch] (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 21:43:35 EST)
• Gérard Roudier
  • Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:37:57 EST)
• Greg from Systems
  • Big Bada Boom... Crapola... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:23:46 EST)
  • Big Bada Boom... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:22:30 EST)
• Gregg Lloyd
  • LILO wont boot my kernel image: More details... (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 23:52:24 EST)
  • Kernel is compiled but LILO wont boot it... (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 00:32:14 EST)
• Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:43:19 EST)
  • Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:59:24 EST)
  • 2.4.0 repeatable opps (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:08:30 EST)
• Gregory McLean
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:15:45 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 15:17:50 EST)
• Gregory T. Norris
  • 2.4.0 CDROM problem, ILLEGAL REQUEST (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:05:12 EST)
• Grover, Andrew
  • RE: [Acpi] [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/include/linux/acpi.h broke ac pid compilation (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:51:18 EST)
• gsdrahei@xenon.cs.adelaide.edu.au
  • Modifying TCP implementation in Linux Kernel? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:43:49 EST)
• Guennadi V. Liakhovetski
  • DMA vs PIO speeds... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:09:14 EST)
• Guus Sliepen
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:31:11 EST)
• H . J . Lu
  • Re: [NFS] [CFT] Improved RPC congestion handling for 2.4.0 (and 2.2.18) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:36:38 EST)
  • Re: [NFS] [CFT] Improved RPC congestion handling for 2.4.0 (and 2.2.18) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:37:40 EST)
• H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:23:33 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:35:14 EST)
  • Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:40:09 EST)
  • Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:12:00 EST)
  • Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:13:55 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:17:47 EST)
• Hans Grobler
  • Re: kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:11:05 EST)
• Hans Reiser
  • Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:23:08 EST)
  • Re: [reiserfs-list] Don't mix reiserfs and RAID5 in linux-2.4.1-pre8, severe corruption (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 07:39:36 EST)
• Heikki Lindholm
  • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:22:44 EST)
• Helge Hafting
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 03:37:41 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:01:38 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:52:04 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 04:41:22 EST)
• Henrik Stokseth
  • Re: Proper OOPS report (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:39:35 EST)
• Henryk Paluch
  • kernel hangs on CD-R HP8100i if compiled w/ VIA IDE support. (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 07:34:09 EST)
  • kernel hangs on CD-R HP8100i if compiled w/ VIA IDE support. (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 07:28:00 EST)
• Herrmann, Achim
  • modules, insmod and multiple object files (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:56:33 EST)
• hgp-linux@madaket.netwizards.net
  • Strange mm problem?? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:46:36 EST)
• hiren_mehta@agilent.com
  • RE: stripping symbols from modules (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:15:24 EST)
• Holger Kiehl
  • Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 03:21:44 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 06:19:10 EST)
  • Re: Serious file system corruption with RAID5+SMP and kernels above2.4.0 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:42:04 EST)
  • Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 07:49:28 EST)
  • Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:36:33 EST)
  • More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 02:47:23 EST)
• Honza Pazdziora
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:09:10 EST)
• Howard Johnson
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:54:18 EST)
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:42:25 EST)
• Hubertus Franke
  • Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:27:03 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:35:03 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:03:05 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:47:52 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:30:04 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:47:06 EST)
• Hugh Dickins
  • Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:28:13 EST)
  • [PATCH] udf writepage UnlockPage (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:39:18 EST)
• Ian Macdonald
  • Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:10:30 EST)
  • Hang when booting 2.4.0/2.4.1-pre8 on Compaq 1850R with SMART 3200 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:48:35 EST)
• Ian S. Nelson
  • How come top and /proc/meminfo on 2.4.0 says 0K shared? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:39:13 EST)
• idalton@ferret.phonewave.net
  • Re: Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:23:15 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:59:06 EST)
• Idan Sofer
  • 815e hang update. (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:54:21 EST)
  • 2.4.0 hangs with PIII i815e system (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:54:20 EST)
• Igmar Palsenberg
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:39:52 EST)
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:52:02 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:57:28 EST)
  • Re: detecting bounced mails (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:50:43 EST)
  • 2.4.0ac9 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:51:56 EST)
• Igor Mozetic
  • 2.4.0 crash [bdflush?] (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:06:15 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:00:44 EST)
  • 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:47:52 EST)
• imel96@trustix.co.id
  • Re: [PATCH] plan9 partition support (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:35:11 EST)
• Ingo Molnar
  • [patch] wait4-2.4.0-A0 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:31:15 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:02:15 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:20:47 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:18:48 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:57:20 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:50:42 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:44:57 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:33:37 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:43:47 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:32:20 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:04:56 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:29:44 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:18:09 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:06:46 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:56:55 EST)
  • Re: Hi memory support in 2.4 not working correctly. (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:09:48 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:42:37 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:37:11 EST)
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:33:44 EST)
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:09:38 EST)
  • O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:04:22 EST)
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:26:12 EST)
  • 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:48:34 EST)
  • Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:19:39 EST)
• Ingo Oeser
  • Re: BUG in modutils or drivers/isdn/hisax/ (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:13:02 EST)
  • BUG in modutils or drivers/isdn/hisax/ (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:31:55 EST)
  • Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:09:01 EST)
• Ishikawa
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:45:20 EST)
• J . A . Magallon
  • swapfs for 2.4.1-pre (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:53:15 EST)
  • lilo and removable media (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:12:03 EST)
  • TLB IPI error (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:17:38 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:15:29 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:25:51 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:45:21 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:32:05 EST)
• J Sloan
  • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) (win98 not honoring partitioning) (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:36:38 EST)
  • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 22:31:46 EST)
  • [OT] Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:55:17 EST)
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:12:11 EST)
  • [OT]: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:06:01 EST)
• J.Brown (Ender/Amigo)
  • Continuing OOP's... (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 04:47:14 EST)
• J.D. Hollis
  • class handles (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:49:44 EST)
• J.W. Hoogervorst
  • IRQ routing problem - SMP related? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:25:22 EST)
• Jakob Borg
  • Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:20:41 EST)
  • Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:58:37 EST)
  • More information on reiserfs bug (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:38:58 EST)
  • kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:20:42 EST)
• Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:05:06 EST)
• jamal
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:47:22 EST)
• James Bottomley
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 11:16:58 EST)
  • Re: Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:56:14 EST)
• James Brents
  • Oops in 2.2.17 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:56:34 EST)
• James Simmons
  • Re: Odd Question: pc_keyb as a module? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 20:14:24 EST)
  • Re: console spin_lock (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:23:11 EST)
  • Re: console spin_lock (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:40:26 EST)
  • console spin_lock (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:05:38 EST)
• James Stevenson
  • [PF_PACKET] and failed checksums (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:34:08 EST)
• James Sutherland
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:37:59 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:00:08 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 04:52:36 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:27:35 EST)
• Jamie Lokier
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:57:05 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:48:49 EST)
• Jan Kara
  • Re: quota and 2.4.0-ac9 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:18:27 EST)
• Jan Niehusmann
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 08:04:33 EST)
• Jan-Benedict Glaw
  • Re: Freeze: atyfb & XFree4.0.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:47:10 EST)
  • Freeze: atyfb & XFree4.0.1 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:20:10 EST)
• Janos Farkas
  • Re: Inconsistent cache size reporting.? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:26:10 EST)
• Jason Saunders
  • Warnings on compiling 2.4.1-pre8 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:15:27 EST)
• Jason Venner
  • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) (win98 not honoring partitioning) (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:13:59 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:35:11 EST)
• Jean-Marc Saffroy
  • Re: [BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:31:16 EST)
  • [BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:09:57 EST)
• Jeff Garzik
  • Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:57:45 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:27:52 EST)
  • [PATCH] Re: Problem with Madge Tokenring (abyss.o) in 2.4.1-pre10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:23:35 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:05:56 EST)
  • Re: Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:33:42 EST)
  • [PATCH] Re: Q: natsemi.c spinlocks (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 09:43:01 EST)
  • Re: Q: natsemi.c spinlocks (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 09:38:21 EST)
  • Re: Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:30:05 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac10 build errors (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:27:44 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac10 patching issue (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:25:38 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:55:21 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:37:19 EST)
• Jeff Hartmann
  • Re: [Dri-devel] Re: AGPGART problems with VIA KX133 chipsets under 2.2.18/2.4.0 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:34:58 EST)
  • Re: AGPGART problems with VIA KX133 chipsets under 2.2.18/2.4.0 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:51:03 EST)
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:00:28 EST)
• Jeff Lightfoot
  • 2.4.1pre9 Oops (was Re: 2.4.1pre8 Oops) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 17:52:18 EST)
  • 2.4.1pre8 Oops (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:41:41 EST)
• Jeffrey Rose
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? *not* Fixed (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:04:54 EST)
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:29:24 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:11:08 EST)
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:38:59 EST)
  • 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:35:05 EST)
• Jens Axboe
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:54:19 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:11:55 EST)
  • Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:42:21 EST)
  • Re: lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:50:27 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:13:03 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:10:04 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:43:51 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:40:23 EST)
• Jens Taprogge
  • Re: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 08:33:29 EST)
• Jeremy M. Dolan
  • test, ignore (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:01:23 EST)
• Jerry Frana
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:36:05 EST)
• Jes Sorensen
  • Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:17:06 EST)
• Jesse Pollard
  • RE: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:47:00 EST)
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:49:52 EST)
  • Re: Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:47:17 EST)
• Jinnah Dylan Hosein
  • Odd Question: pc_keyb as a module? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:37:59 EST)
• Joe deBlaquiere
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:32:52 EST)
  • Re: more on scheduler benchmarks (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:22:58 EST)
• Joel Franco Guzmán
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:34:40 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:30:09 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:31:22 EST)
  • PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:11:36 EST)
• Johannes Erdfelt
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:37:31 EST)
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:08:49 EST)
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:34:42 EST)
  • Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 00:38:12 EST)
• John Cavan
  • Networking strangeness 2.4.0-ac9 and earlier (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 12:03:56 EST)
  • Re: Coding Style (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:26:01 EST)
• John Clemens
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:14:38 EST)
• John Fremlin
  • [PATCH] include/linux/rtc.h tiny typo (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 11:10:05 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/include/linux/acpi.h broke acpid compilation (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 11:05:20 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-x features ? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:14:18 EST)
• John Jasen
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:34:10 EST)
  • PROBLEM: raid assembly on 2.4.0-2.4.1-pre9 fails (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:35:15 EST)
  • Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 21:24:39 EST)
  • Re: Serious file system corruption with RAID5+SMP and kernels above2.4.0 (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:50:40 EST)
  • md problems (2.4.0/2.4.1-pre7 on alpha) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:36:25 EST)
• John Kacur
  • sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:56:14 EST)
• John Kodis
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:42:16 EST)
• John O'Donnell
  • Re: Ibcs2 or abi for kernel 2.4 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:34:32 EST)
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:19:31 EST)
  • Re: .br blacklisted ? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:29:27 EST)
  • Re: .br blacklisted ? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:11:52 EST)
• John Roll
  • Network hang with 2.4.1-pre9 and 3c59x (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:40:58 EST)
• John Summerfield
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:48:37 EST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:52:06 EST)
• Jon Eisenstein
  • PROBLEM: Kernel crash with cron/mail? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:58:40 EST)
• Jonathan Earle
  • RE: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:22:04 EST)
  • RE: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:41:49 EST)
  • RE: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:14:24 EST)
  • RE: Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:07:10 EST)
  • RE: [OT?] Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:53:48 EST)
  • RE: [OT?] Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:04:50 EST)
  • Ethernet Bonding Performance under kernel 2.4.0 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:48:31 EST)
• Jonathan Walther
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:44:37 EST)
• Jordan
  • [Off-Topic] Support For 1 Ghz on Tyan Trinity 400 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:11:47 EST)
• Jorge Boncompte \(DTI2\)
  • RE: ERR in /proc/interrupts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:58:31 EST)
  • RE: ERR in /proc/interrupts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:31:38 EST)
  • ERR in /proc/interrupts (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:54:24 EST)
• Jorge Nerin
  • kernel BUG at slab.c:1542! (2.4.1-pre9) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:23:04 EST)
  • Re: APIC errors (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:17:52 EST)
• Josh Myer
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 02:07:59 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:36:19 EST)
• Joshua M. Thompson
  • Re: M68K mac 2.2.18 doesn't compile (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:06:21 EST)
• Juhani Rautiainen
  • VIA VT82C686 serial port over 115200 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:13:09 EST)
• Julien Gaulmin
  • Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 neither (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:41:48 EST)
• Jun Nakajima
  • Re: [Lse-tech] multi-queue scheduler update (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:49:27 EST)
• junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 02:06:32 EST)
  • 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:28:28 EST)
• Jussi Hamalainen
  • RE: ipchains blocking port 65535 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:12:14 EST)
  • ipchains blocking port 65535 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:40:10 EST)
• Justin T. Gibbs
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:56:49 EST)
• Kai Germaschewski
  • Re: BUG in modutils or drivers/isdn/hisax/ (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:42:23 EST)
  • Re: (2.4.0->2.4.1-pre8) config problem with PCMCIA causing link error (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:29:36 EST)
• Kai Henningsen
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:36:00 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 09:56:00 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:46:00 EST)
• Karsten Keil
  • Re: BUG in modutils or drivers/isdn/hisax/ (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:28:49 EST)
• Keith Owens
  • Re: stripping symbols from modules (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:06:23 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:19:38 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:43:34 EST)
  • Announce: modutils 2.4.2 is available (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:14:24 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:37:02 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:30:36 EST)
  • Re: krnl newbie: problems with EXPORT_SYMBOL() (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:21:57 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:09:04 EST)
• Keven Belanger
  • Problems with sound card and NIC (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:14:43 EST)
• Kim Pelham
  • Looking for a Linux expert--great job opportunity (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:49:30 EST)
• Kostas Nikoloudakis
  • eepro100 error messages (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 22:02:52 EST)
• Kristofer T. Karas
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8, webbrowsers and proxies... (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:29:12 EST)
• kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:37:49 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:00:05 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:22:14 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:39:36 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:05:45 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:53:42 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:03:43 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:28:04 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:18:00 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:03:19 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:18:04 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:52:53 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:30:22 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:37:10 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:11:12 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:59:11 EST)
• LA Walsh
  • 2.4 cpu usage... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:32:55 EST)
  • RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:22:02 EST)
• Laramie Leavitt
  • RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:00:19 EST)
• Larry McVoy
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:58:05 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:01:10 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:22:54 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:36:55 EST)
• Leslie Donaldson
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 00:30:13 EST)
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:48:25 EST)
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:05:45 EST)
  • Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:40:16 EST)
• Lincoln Dale
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:09:30 EST)
• Linda Walsh
  • Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:06:47 EST)
• Linus Torvalds
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:03:38 EST)
  • 2.4.1-test10 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 20:13:19 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:54:00 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:33:20 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:25:45 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:01:54 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:39:30 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:26:52 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre9 fails to compile drm r128 as module (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:38:17 EST)
  • Re: Coding Style (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 01:29:35 EST)
  • Re: Coding Style (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 00:34:42 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:45:09 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:55:59 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:53:40 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:14:01 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:52:33 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:45:45 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:42:03 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:50:02 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:04:33 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:51:19 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:49:38 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:24:12 EST)
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 01:46:11 EST)
  • Re: What happened to your kernel changelogs? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:45:34 EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:23:05 EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:13:31 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:53:14 EST)
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:33:42 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:22:10 EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:32:35 EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:27:52 EST)
  • Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 20:14:29 EST)
  • Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:25:33 EST)
  • Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:36:43 EST)
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:47:46 EST)
  • Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 23:59:02 EST)
• Linux Admin
  • boot.img & initrd.img (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 23:16:06 EST)
• Listuser AVA System
  • Driver crash 2.4.0 nicstar.c (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:11:21 EST)
• Lukasz Trabinski
  • Re: eepro100 error messages (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:29:51 EST)
• M T
  • quota and 2.4.0-ac9 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 02:15:50 EST)
• Maciej W. Rozycki
  • Re: APIC errors (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:26:42 EST)
  • [patch] 2.4.0, 2.2.18: A critical problem with tty_io.c (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:55:14 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 07:24:14 EST)
  • Re: patch: enabling RDPMC: bit 8 in CR4 (PCE) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:14:41 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:08:03 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:37:53 EST)
  • Re: APIC errors (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:22:25 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:25:39 EST)
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:23:59 EST)
• Malahal Rao Naineni
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:38:19 EST)
• Manfred Spraul
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: Q: natsemi.c spinlocks (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:51:34 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:14:13 EST)
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 06:49:16 EST)
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 03:36:42 EST)
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:00:21 EST)
  • [2.4.1-pre8] MPP related OPPS (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:40:52 EST)
  • Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:59:56 EST)
  • More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:18:05 EST)
  • 2.4.0-ac9: bug in drivers/message/fusion/mptctl.c (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 11:50:16 EST)
• Marcelo Tosatti
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:48:24 EST)
  • Re: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed. for 2.4.1-pre9 (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:46:41 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-test10 (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 23:37:29 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:30:03 EST)
  • Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 20:20:13 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:55:33 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:00:24 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:24:40 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:52:36 EST)
  • [RFC] generic IO write clustering (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:34:44 EST)
  • Re: pre5 VM feedback.. (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:57:03 EST)
  • Re: pre5 VM feedback.. (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:51:01 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:51:03 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:49:00 EST)
  • Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:25:54 EST)
  • 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:17:13 EST)
• Marian Jancar
  • Strange QoS problem (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:02:42 EST)
  • CBQ clases (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:32:14 EST)
• Mark Hahn
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:00:16 EST)
• Mark Hemment
  • Re: 4G SGI quad Xeon - memory-related slowdowns (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:14:20 EST)
• Mark I Manning IV
  • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:27:24 EST)
  • Re: Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:28:18 EST)
  • Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:35:48 EST)
  • Re: [OT?] Coding Style (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:42:54 EST)
  • <