Re: multi-queue scheduler update

From: John Clemens (john@deater.net)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:14:38 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update"
Next in thread: Mike Kravetz: "Re: multi-queue scheduler update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

While I agree that this is probably only a win for very specialized tasks,
I'd be interested in seeing this patch implemented on a NUMA machine, with
one runqueue per node... anybody willing to try it? I don't have access to
one. How about from the Linux Scalability project at SGI? any comments?

john.c

-- John Clemens http://www.deater.net/john john@deater.net ICQ: 7175925, IM: PianoManO8 "I Hate Quotes" -- Samuel L. Clemens

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update"
Next in thread: Mike Kravetz: "Re: multi-queue scheduler update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:19 EST