On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 05:34:35PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:30:41AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 04:52:25PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > > was less than the number of processors. I'll give the tests a try
> > > with a smaller number of threads. I'm also open to suggestions for
> >
> > OK!
> >
> > > what benchmarks/test methods I could use for scheduler testing. If
> > > you remember what people have used in the past, please let me know.
> >
> > It was this one IIRC (it spawns threads calling sched_yield() in loop).
>
> Thanks!
It was my intention to post IIRC numbers for small thread counts today.
However, the benchmark (not the system) seems to hang on occasion. This
occurs on both the unmodified 2.4.0 kernel and the one which contains
my multi-queue patch. Therefore, I'm pretty sure it is not something
I did. :)
Anyone else see anything like this before? I'll look into the reason
for the hang, but it will delay my posting of these numbers.
-- Mike Kravetz mkravetz@sequent.com IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:21 EST