Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

From: Andreas Dilger (adilger@turbolinux.com)
Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:39:56 EST


Tim Fletcher writes:
> You can already do this, just specify /dev/md0 as the device to install
> onto, and lilo does the rest
>
> > This would potentially allow you to boot from the second drive if the
> > first one fails, assuming the kernel does UUID or LABEL resolution for
> > the root device. The kernel would boot from the first BIOS drive, and
> > would search for a UUID or LABEL as the root device.
>
> I have a mirrored boot drive in a pair of firewalls / routers and to test
> before I put them into service I pulled hda and the machine booted fine
> from hdc and baring winging about the missing disk (all the drives are
> mirrored) carried on as normal. A fresh disk was put and rebuilt no
> problems and was then booted off with the other disk missing.

Ahh. What I was missing was that by specifying /dev/md0 as the root device,
not only do you get an identical map for the kernels, but the root device
remains /dev/md0 no matter which drive fails and LILO/kernel don't need to
do anything special to find it. This assumes the BIOS can boot from /dev/hdc
to start with (i.e. /dev/hda is totally gone).

How does MD/RAID0 know which array should be /dev/md0? What if you had a
second array on /dev/hdb and /dev/hdd, would that become /dev/md0 (assuming
it had a kernel/boot sector)?

Cheers, Andreas

-- 
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:17 EST