Linux-Kernel Archive
By Date

Starting: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 00:01:27 EST
Ending: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:34:13 EST

• Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Ralf Baechle (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 23:58:48 EST)
• Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 23:59:02 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Tim Hockin (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 00:35:16 EST)
• Re: mmap()/VM problems in 2.4.0 Vlad Bolkhovitine (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 01:43:01 EST)
• ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded rtviado (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 01:48:40 EST)
• 2.4.0 - lseek on /proc broken? [with patch] Salvador Ortiz Garcia (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 01:53:47 EST)
• Doc bug? Is Sangoma S514 PCI WAN card supported? Michael D. Crawford (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 22:29:23 EST)
• Re: mmap()/VM problems in 2.4.0 Mike Galbraith (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 02:06:58 EST)
• quota and 2.4.0-ac9 M T (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 02:15:50 EST)
• "Received disconnect: Command terminated on signal 13." when logging in via ssh Allen Bolderoff (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 02:19:38 EST)
• 2.4.0ac9 Igmar Palsenberg (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:51:56 EST)
• 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing Bobo Rajec (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:08:38 EST)
• Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Urban Widmark (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:40:47 EST)
• Re: Bug in swapfs (2.4.0-ac9) Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:50:09 EST)
• Re: [linux-lvm] Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 0.9.1 beta1 available at www.sistina.com Patrick Caulfield (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 03:51:18 EST)
• 2.4.0-ac6, 'rm' stalls in wait_on_buffer David Ford (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:06:50 EST)
• Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:19:39 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing Tigran Aivazian (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:26:50 EST)
• Re: a linux qos mailing list bert hubert (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:24:13 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing Tigran Aivazian (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:29:32 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] plan9 partition support imel96@trustix.co.id (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:35:11 EST)
• 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:48:34 EST)
• Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Eric W. Biederman (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 04:34:39 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek (Mon Jan 15 2001 - 18:16:33 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 05:40:18 EST)
• Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:13:23 EST)
• Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:26:12 EST)
• Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:37:43 EST)
• 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK Igor Mozetic (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:47:52 EST)
• modules, insmod and multiple object files Herrmann, Achim (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:56:33 EST)
• 2.4.0 and grub (0.5.96.1) Martin Maciaszek (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:54:49 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Peter Samuelson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:56:48 EST)
• O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:04:22 EST)
• Re: modules, insmod and multiple object files Peter Samuelson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:04:49 EST)
• Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:09:38 EST)
• Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Peter Samuelson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:13:42 EST)
• [Patch] shmem fixes for 2.4.1-pre7 Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:16:18 EST)
• Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:34:05 EST)
• Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Petr Vandrovec (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:36:46 EST)
• Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:33:44 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:37:11 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 neither Julien Gaulmin (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:41:48 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:42:37 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 07:47:37 EST)
• Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Mitchell Blank Jr (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:00:04 EST)
• devices.txt missing some info about OSS devices David Balazic (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:10:32 EST)
• problem mounting root under 2.4.0 Chris Jones (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:40:41 EST)
• Re: ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded Sven Koch (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:44:32 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? jamal (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:47:22 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jamie Lokier (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:48:49 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:50:49 EST)
• Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Jamie Lokier (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:57:05 EST)
• Process hung in "D" state with 2.2.18 Udo A. Steinberg (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:11:08 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Felix von Leitner (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:20:23 EST)
• [Patch2] shmem fixes for 2.4.1-pre7 Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:20:44 EST)
• Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Felix von Leitner (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:27:56 EST)
• Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Felix von Leitner (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:40:13 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:41:16 EST)
• Oops 0000 Stephan Henningsen (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 09:46:17 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:05:06 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jakub Jelinek (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:05:06 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:20:48 EST)
• nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Mogens Kjaer (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:21:07 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David L. Parsley (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:46:03 EST)
• Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:49:05 EST)
• Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Trond Myklebust (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:53:25 EST)
• lock_kernel() ? Armin Schindler (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:54:12 EST)
• Re: Doc bug? Is Sangoma S514 PCI WAN card supported? Nenad Corbic (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 10:59:31 EST)
• Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Trond Myklebust (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:04:43 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Woodhouse (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:06:46 EST)
• qlogicfc.c hard lockups in 2.4.0 Rob Landley (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:15:22 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:19:34 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Arjan van de Ven (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:27:48 EST)
• [PATCH] maestro3 oops + fix (for ac9!) Andres Salomon (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:29:25 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Brian Gerst (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:31:29 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Florent Cueto (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:23:28 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:31:25 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:35:36 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Matthias Andree (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:40:56 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK Anders Peter Fugmann (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:42:27 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Dominik Kubla (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:40:09 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:43:29 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Douglas Gilbert (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:45:05 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:46:43 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Eddie Williams (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:53:47 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:51:38 EST)
• Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate... Petr Vandrovec (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:59:05 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 11:56:13 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:04:02 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Brian Gerst (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:04:57 EST)
• [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Adam Lackorzynski (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:12:07 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-x features ? John Fremlin (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:14:18 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Eddie Williams (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:24:49 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Honza Pazdziora (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:09:10 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Bryan Henderson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:30:55 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Malahal Rao Naineni (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:38:19 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:39:25 EST)
• Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:47:46 EST)
• [patch] swapfs fixes against and comments on ac9 Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:56:27 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Woodhouse (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:58:11 EST)
• APM, ACPI, WOL, Oh My! Alex Deucher (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:11:15 EST)
• kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Jakob Borg (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:20:42 EST)
• Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate... Chad Miller (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:22:51 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Timur Tabi (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:22:56 EST)
• [patch2] swapfs fixes against ac9 Christoph Rohland (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:31:05 EST)
• Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate... Petr Vandrovec (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:34:29 EST)
• Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:36:43 EST)
• More information on reiserfs bug Jakob Borg (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:38:58 EST)
• Re: APM, ACPI, WOL, Oh My! Alex Deucher (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:54:31 EST)
• Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Jakob Borg (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 13:58:37 EST)
• Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) tytso@valinux.com (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:04:45 EST)
• SCSI partitions ed@alcpress.com (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:10:41 EST)
• Re: More information on reiserfs bug Chris Mason (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:12:23 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Matthew D. Pitts (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:18:25 EST)
• Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Chris Mason (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:18:43 EST)
• Re: problem mounting root under 2.4.0 Chris Jones (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:20:22 EST)
• Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Jakob Borg (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:20:41 EST)
• Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related? Maciej W. Rozycki (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:23:59 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:28:28 EST)
• Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:33:34 EST)
• Re: SCSI partitions Brian Gerst (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:33:40 EST)
• PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre7 hard freeze root (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:47:16 EST)
• [PATCH] rrunner.c Val Henson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:52:21 EST)
• Ethernet Bonding Performance under kernel 2.4.0 Jonathan Earle (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:48:31 EST)
• Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? André Dahlqvist (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:55:58 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:01:12 EST)
• Re: bug (isdn-subsystem?) in 2.4.0 Ronny Buchmann (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:49:43 EST)
• Name of SCSI Device Carles Pina i Estany (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:17:53 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Christopher Friesen (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:54:23 EST)
• [BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt Jean-Marc Saffroy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:09:57 EST)
• Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) tytso@valinux.com (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:10:31 EST)
• Failure to mount INITRD on a 1GB or 2GB machine w/ 4GB bigmem enabled. (2.4.0)] Adam Scislowicz (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:14:47 EST)
• Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Urban Widmark (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:17:37 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:14:22 EST)
• Update on RTS/CTS serial problem with 2.4.0 Richard B. Johnson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:23:19 EST)
• Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:25:33 EST)
• Re: HP Pavilion 8290 HANGS on boot 2.4/2.4-test9 Pavel Machek (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 06:18:45 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:30:34 EST)
• oops 2.2.18 octave klaba (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:29:23 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Michael Meissner (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:37:57 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:35:25 EST)
• G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...) Chad Miller (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:55:46 EST)
• Re: 4G SGI quad Xeon - memory-related slowdowns Mark Hemment (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:14:20 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c check request_irq (240p3) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 15:57:24 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:01:25 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Timur Tabi (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:04:01 EST)
• Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only) Rodney M. Jokerst (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:11:01 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andreas Dilger (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:11:21 EST)
• Re: Name of SCSI Device Andreas Dilger (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:13:24 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andreas Dilger (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:18:26 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Michael Meissner (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:23:15 EST)
• Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Petr Vandrovec (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:32:21 EST)
• Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb o Petr Vandrovec (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:43:22 EST)
• Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only) Nathan Thompson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:43:29 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-x features ? Pierre Rousselet (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 16:50:43 EST)
• Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only) Rodney M. Jokerst (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:01:20 EST)
• super_operations in -pre7 Matthew Wilcox (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:13:57 EST)
• Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 Chad Miller (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:16:23 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? John Summerfield (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:52:06 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? John Summerfield (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:48:37 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-x features ? Pierre Rousselet (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:18:57 EST)
• lance.c @ 100Mbit Eli Carter (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:27:43 EST)
• Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 Petr Vandrovec (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:29:21 EST)
• Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Urban Widmark (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:38:34 EST)
• Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 richard.morgan9 (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:40:24 EST)
• RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Rainer Mager (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:42:13 EST)
• Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit Cort Dougan (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:41:36 EST)
• Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit Richard B. Johnson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:49:01 EST)
• Re: SCSI partitions David Lang (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:39:04 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Peter Samuelson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:51:54 EST)
• Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit Barry K. Nathan (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:53:57 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:54:36 EST)
• Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 Urban Widmark (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:59:33 EST)
• Re: super_operations in -pre7 Andreas Dilger (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 17:59:37 EST)
• Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:05:10 EST)
• [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)] Rick Jones (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:13:06 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? J . A . Magallon (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:32:05 EST)
• 2.0.37 crashes immediately Stefan Ring (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:35:39 EST)
• Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit Eli Carter (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:37:17 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:51:06 EST)
• Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 dean gaudet (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:03:42 EST)
• console spin_lock James Simmons (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:05:38 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:05:26 EST)
• Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:08:42 EST)
• What happened to merge_segments()? D.W.Howells (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:05:13 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Peter Samuelson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:28:06 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] maestro3 oops + fix (for ac9!) Zach Brown (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:39:11 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Michael Meissner (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:42:10 EST)
• Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? Aaron Lehmann (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 20:05:39 EST)
• Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 20:14:29 EST)
• /proc/PID/stat format apark@cdf.toronto.edu (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 08:26:46 EST)
• Compiling 2.4.1-preX series Shawn Starr (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 20:35:29 EST)
• RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Duncan Laurie (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 20:39:46 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:40:27 EST)
• Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 Mike A. Harris (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:04:42 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Peter Samuelson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:05:05 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Peter Samuelson (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:14:01 EST)
• Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series Jes Sorensen (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:17:06 EST)
• Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series Shawn Starr (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:21:12 EST)
• Can't compile shmem.c in 2.4.0-ac9 Michael D. Crawford (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:07:48 EST)
• eepro100 error messages Kostas Nikoloudakis (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 22:02:52 EST)
• Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only) Shane Shrybman (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 22:27:14 EST)
• Re: Can't compile shmem.c in 2.4.0-ac9 Michael D. Crawford (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:33:09 EST)
• Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Mike A. Harris (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:08:24 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops Neil Brown (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 22:21:51 EST)
• Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] dean gaudet (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:39:04 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Rik van Riel (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:48:39 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-vmbigpatch compile problem Rik van Riel (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:59:38 EST)
• Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Anton Blanchard (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:36:47 EST)
• Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Anton Blanchard (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 23:43:01 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 00:16:35 EST)
• Re: .br blacklisted ? Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 00:36:21 EST)
• VM: Undead swap messages at shutdown Burton Windle (Sat Jan 13 2001 - 14:23:41 EST)
• Where to get reiserfs-utils? Michael D. Crawford (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:52:50 EST)
• Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Mogens Kjaer (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 01:53:16 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 01:56:09 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 02:06:32 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Steve VanDevender (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 02:31:32 EST)
• Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Matthias Schniedermeyer (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:33:09 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:09:35 EST)
• Re: .br blacklisted ? John O'Donnell (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:11:52 EST)
• APIC errors Dominik Kubla (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:14:32 EST)
• Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Matti Aarnio (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:14:50 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre8, webbrowsers and proxies... Svein Erik Brostigen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:12:33 EST)
• 2.4.0-vmpatch-15.1 still no go Boszormenyi Zoltan (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:36:07 EST)
• Re: eepro100 error messages bert hubert (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:35:59 EST)
• Re: .br blacklisted ? Peter Samuelson (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:37:16 EST)
• ServerWorks IDE in 2.4.0-ac4 Markus Schlup (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:05:18 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Martin Mares (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:52:21 EST)
• Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Stefan Ring (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:00:31 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK Igor Mozetic (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:00:44 EST)
• Re: .br blacklisted ? Roeland Th. Jansen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:06:10 EST)
• Incorrect module init message.. Mike A. Harris (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:09:15 EST)
• Problems in 2.4 kernel Sajeev (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:12:18 EST)
• Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately David Weinehall (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:15:56 EST)
• Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel aprasad@in.ibm.com (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:13:09 EST)
• Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Richard Torkar (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:20:14 EST)
• Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Andreas Dilger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:24:39 EST)
• 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Jeffrey Rose (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:35:05 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Jeff Garzik (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:37:19 EST)
• Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Jeffrey Rose (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:38:59 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Woodhouse (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:38:47 EST)
• Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Stefan Ring (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:43:13 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Ishikawa (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:45:20 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Jeff Garzik (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:55:21 EST)
• Overriding BIOS settings with kernel 2.4.0 bandit2@iname.com (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:03:54 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Woodhouse (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:02:07 EST)
• Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Giacomo Catenazzi (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 04:55:40 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Christian Gennerat (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:05:13 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Jeffrey Rose (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:11:08 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Christian Gennerat (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:10:23 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andreas Dilger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:12:22 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Adam Lackorzynski (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:14:49 EST)
• Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Eric W. Biederman (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:35:56 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andreas Dilger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:19:28 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:21:06 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Boszormenyi Zoltan (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:28:27 EST)
• Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Jeffrey Rose (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:29:24 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Fixed Christian Gennerat (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:34:31 EST)
• [PATCH] ewrk3 update for 2.4 Nathan Hand (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:40:47 EST)
• Re: /proc/PID/stat format Erik Mouw (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:43:49 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:48:37 EST)
• detecting bounced mails Rajiv Majumdar (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:03:08 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:56:53 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? *not* Fixed Jeffrey Rose (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:04:54 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:04:41 EST)
• Re: detecting bounced mails Matti Aarnio (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:10:16 EST)
• Re: qlogicfc.c hard lockups in 2.4.0 Rob Landley (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:17:27 EST)
• Patch: Pass parameters to xirc2ps_cs via kernel command line David Luyer (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:28:21 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Maciej W. Rozycki (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:25:39 EST)
• Re: APIC errors Maciej W. Rozycki (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:22:25 EST)
• CBQ clases Marian Jancar (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:32:14 EST)
• Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? roger@kea.grace.cri.nz (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:36:56 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre8 and Athlon Peter Horton (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:42:11 EST)
• Re: ServerWorks IDE in 2.4.0-ac4 Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:48:18 EST)
• Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 David Santinoli (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 06:54:17 EST)
• Killing process with SIGKILL and ncpfs Petr Vandrovec (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 07:09:52 EST)
• Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately David Weinehall (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 07:33:36 EST)
• Re: Killing process with SIGKILL and ncpfs Urban Widmark (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 07:41:39 EST)
• Re: qlogicfc.c hard lockups in 2.4.0 - solved? Rob Landley (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:04:15 EST)
• Problem with networking in 2.4.0 snpe (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:06:17 EST)
• Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 Jerry Frana (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:36:05 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8 and Athlon Tom Leete (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:35:59 EST)
• [PATCH 2.4] fs/super.c - paratition boundary checking before mount Dan Aloni (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:35:46 EST)
• ipchains blocking port 65535 Jussi Hamalainen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:40:10 EST)
• Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 David Woodhouse (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:40:56 EST)
• Re: console spin_lock Andrew Morton (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:49:37 EST)
• [PATCH] emu10k1 missing unlock's rui.sousa@conexant.com (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 08:47:03 EST)
• Re: Where to get reiserfs-utils? Stephane Jourdois (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:00:23 EST)
• SCHED_FIFO/SCHED_RR in 2.4 vs 2.2 Patrik Hagglund (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:21:31 EST)
• RE:[preview] VIA IDE driver v3.11 with vt82c686b UDMA100 support Chandler, Alan (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:38:00 EST)
• RE: ipchains blocking port 65535 Tony Gale (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:50:10 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ben Mansell (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:02:02 EST)
• Re: [preview] VIA IDE driver v3.11 with vt82c686b UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:03:40 EST)
• What happened to your kernel changelogs? Tobias Ringstrom (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:26:35 EST)
• RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Mike Porter (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:33:06 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? J . A . Magallon (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:45:21 EST)
• md problems (2.4.0/2.4.1-pre7 on alpha) John Jasen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:36:25 EST)
• Re: Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 James Bottomley (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:56:14 EST)
• Common Abstraction of Notification & Completion Handling Mechanisms - observations and potential RFC bsuparna@in.ibm.com (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 10:34:43 EST)
• Re: Killing process with SIGKILL and ncpfs Petr Vandrovec (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 11:09:39 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? James Bottomley (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 11:16:58 EST)
• 2.4.0-ac9: bug in drivers/message/fusion/mptctl.c Manfred Spraul (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 11:50:16 EST)
• Re: [linux-fbdev] Re: console spin_lock Petr Vandrovec (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:05:25 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Werner Almesberger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:04:33 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Craig Ruff (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:07:09 EST)
• RE: ipchains blocking port 65535 Jussi Hamalainen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:12:14 EST)
• IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) Tony Gale (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:15:54 EST)
• test only do not read david (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:16:13 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Michael Meissner (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:22:34 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8, webbrowsers and proxies... Kristofer T. Karas (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:29:12 EST)
• need help raid and 2.4.0 david (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:27:42 EST)
• Re: IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) Andi Kleen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:35:47 EST)
• File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Terrence Martin (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:48:50 EST)
• Re: IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) Tony Gale (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:44:30 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Petr Matula (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:50:47 EST)
• Hi memory support in 2.4 not working correctly. Micah Gorrell (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:51:25 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Petr Matula (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:53:12 EST)
• RE: Problems in 2.4 kernel MEHTA,HIREN (A-SanJose,ex1) (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 12:49:58 EST)
• Re: IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) Andi Kleen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:01:26 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Mo McKinlay (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 19:37:49 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:06:38 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac9: NTFS cleanup & assorted bugfixes Anton Altaparmakov (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:11:06 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:11:15 EST)
• krnl newbie: problems with EXPORT_SYMBOL() Michael Palme (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:18:40 EST)
• Re: 4G SGI quad Xeon -memory-related slowdowns Paul Hubbard (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:19:16 EST)
• Re: eepro100 error messages Lukasz Trabinski (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:29:51 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Vojtech Pavlik (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:32:11 EST)
• Relative CPU time limit Xuan Baldauf (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:33:23 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:40:13 EST)
• Re: console spin_lock Roman Zippel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:22:36 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Douglas Gilbert (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:41:18 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Vojtech Pavlik (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:46:06 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Terrence Martin (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:53:36 EST)
• Re: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? roger@kea.grace.cri.nz (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:00:57 EST)
• Re: need help raid and 2.4.0 Thomas Dodd (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:01:44 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Vojtech Pavlik (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:03:49 EST)
• [OT]: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? J Sloan (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:06:01 EST)
• Re: Relative CPU time limit Padraig Brady (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:09:22 EST)
• Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series - Confirmed - PGCC sucks Shawn Starr (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:08:42 EST)
• Re: Hi memory support in 2.4 not working correctly. Ingo Molnar (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:09:48 EST)
• Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 J Sloan (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:12:11 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Zlatko Calusic (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 13:53:31 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Werner Almesberger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:22:22 EST)
• Re: [OT]: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? roger@kea.grace.cri.nz (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:22:05 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:27:40 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:27:52 EST)
• Re: .br blacklisted ? John O'Donnell (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:29:27 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:32:35 EST)
• Strange mm problem?? hgp-linux@madaket.netwizards.net (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:46:36 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Werner Almesberger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:50:07 EST)
• Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock Chris Mason (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:57:26 EST)
• kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" Rick Richardson (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:54:20 EST)
• Strange QoS problem Marian Jancar (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:02:42 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:03:03 EST)
• [OOPS] with 2.2.18 Udo A. Steinberg (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:16:04 EST)
• Re: kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" Brian Pomerantz (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:17:19 EST)
• [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to 2.4.1pre8) Shawn Starr (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:34:50 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Matti Aarnio (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:32:06 EST)
• Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to 2.4.1pre8) Sven Koch (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:32:30 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] dean gaudet (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:38:23 EST)
• Re: Relative CPU time limit Xuan Baldauf (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:39:20 EST)
• Linux 2.0.4 has FS corruption (not IDE) Richard B. Johnson (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:39:23 EST)
• Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to 2.4.1pre8) Brian Gerst (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:34:03 EST)
• Re: kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" Timur Tabi (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:39:57 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andreas Dilger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:43:49 EST)
• Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to 2.4.1pre8) Tim Waugh (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:46:42 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Werner Almesberger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:46:50 EST)
• PROBLEM: 2.4.0/smp damaged my filesystems (raid-ext2/ext2) Oliver Teuber (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:47:42 EST)
• Re: APIC errors Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:54:27 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 15:57:42 EST)
• TOD clock slows on active 2.4 NFS client Tom Eastep (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:01:07 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Dan Hollis (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:17:41 EST)
• Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to2.4.1pre8) Shawn Starr (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:16:32 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Andi Kleen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:21:14 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:22:10 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:26:05 EST)
• PCMCIA problem loading ide-floppy from ide_cs Paul Bristow (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:37:23 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:33:42 EST)
• Re: detecting bounced mails Igmar Palsenberg (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:50:43 EST)
• oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Scott A. Sibert (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:47:58 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Igmar Palsenberg (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:57:28 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Dan Kegel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:51:31 EST)
• Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Matthias Schniedermeyer (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:49:37 EST)
• VIA chipset discussion David D.W. Downey (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:02:17 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/blz1230.c check request_irq return (240p3) Rasmus Andersen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:13:53 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:17:36 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/dec_esp.c check request_irq return code (240p3) Rasmus Andersen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:18:52 EST)
• [DISCUSSION]: 2.4.1-pre8: Detection of CD-ROM/CD-R/CD-RW drives Shawn Starr (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:22:26 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/mvme147.c care about (some) return codes (240p3) Rasmus Andersen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:23:20 EST)
• Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Urban Widmark (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:24:05 EST)
• Re: [DISCUSSION]: 2.4.1-pre8: Detection of CD-ROM/CD-R/CD-RW drives Part #2 Shawn Starr (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:26:26 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/sgiwd93.c check some more return codes (240p3) Rasmus Andersen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:26:53 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Pete Toscano (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:40:06 EST)
• [rasmus@jaquet.dk: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/sun3x_esp.c check request_irq's return value (240p3)] Rasmus Andersen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:43:57 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:44:06 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:53:14 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Jonathan Walther (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:44:37 EST)
• PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Joel Franco Guzmán (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:11:36 EST)
• Re: [OT]: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? David Ford (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:17:48 EST)
• Ibcs2 or abi for kernel 2.4 snpe (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:18:35 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Russell King (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:19:23 EST)
• VIA VT82C686 serial port over 115200 Juhani Rautiainen (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:13:09 EST)
• Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 (fwd) Mike A. Harris (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:25:12 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andreas Dilger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:23:55 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble J . A . Magallon (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:25:51 EST)
• Re: console spin_lock James Simmons (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:40:26 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Tim Fletcher (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:57:23 EST)
• RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Rainer Mager (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 18:59:01 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tim Fletcher (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:14:42 EST)
• RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Urban Widmark (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:30:11 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:32:44 EST)
• Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 16:15:50 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:05:43 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Tim Fletcher (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:39:31 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:28:13 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 09:26:04 EST)
• Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:33:23 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 03:46:44 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andreas Dilger (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:39:56 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:53:33 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tim Fletcher (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 19:59:22 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Peter Samuelson (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:03:50 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Andre Hedrick (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:14:02 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:13:31 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:23:05 EST)
• Re: What happened to your kernel changelogs? Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:26:02 EST)
• Re: Relative CPU time limit Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:29:52 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Rik van Riel (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:32:01 EST)
• Re: What happened to your kernel changelogs? Linus Torvalds (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:45:34 EST)
• (2.4.0->2.4.1-pre8) config problem with PCMCIA causing link error Derek Wildstar (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:57:03 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Olivier Galibert (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 21:34:59 EST)
• Re: Overriding BIOS settings with kernel 2.4.0 Matt Kemner (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 22:23:32 EST)
• oops report (2.4.1-pre7) Markus Berndt (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 22:07:17 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Rogerio Brito (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 23:04:08 EST)
• Adaptec SCSI RAID ASR-2100S Claudio Martins (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:09:53 EST)
• Re: kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" Hans Grobler (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:11:05 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Josh Myer (Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:36:19 EST)
• Documenting stat(2) Eric S. Raymond (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 00:28:12 EST)
• Patches Alan Cox (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 01:34:02 EST)
• Re: Documenting stat(2) Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 01:46:11 EST)
• [ANNOUNCE] Dynamic Probes 1.3 released bsuparna@in.ibm.com (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 01:49:25 EST)
• cddrive problem in Toshiba Laptop with 2.4.0-test11 kernel archan (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 02:05:35 EST)
• Documenting stat(2) dmeyer@dmeyer.net (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 02:05:28 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Petr Matula (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 02:43:40 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Rogier Wolff (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:23:15 EST)
• Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:23:41 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Ville Herva (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:38:09 EST)
• missing closing bracket in arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c Vladimir V. Klenov (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:34:54 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Andre Hedrick (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:45:13 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Ville Herva (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:52:01 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Petr Matula (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:58:10 EST)
• Re: PCMCIA problem loading ide-floppy from ide_cs Christian Gennerat (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:59:50 EST)
• Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Petr Vandrovec (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 04:09:19 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Maciej W. Rozycki (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:37:53 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Petr Vandrovec (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 04:24:04 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 04:34:14 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Helge Hafting (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 04:41:22 EST)
• Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Urban Widmark (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 04:49:06 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andreas Dilger (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 05:01:01 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Stefan Ring (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 05:02:19 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Andre Hedrick (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 05:01:45 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 05:14:59 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:01:29 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Russell Leighton (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:04:17 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble J . A . Magallon (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:15:29 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Maciej W. Rozycki (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:08:03 EST)
• Re: (2.4.0->2.4.1-pre8) config problem with PCMCIA causing link error Kai Germaschewski (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:29:36 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tim Fletcher (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:35:57 EST)
• Re: Documenting stat(2) Padraig Brady (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:53:32 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Peter Samuelson (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:17:37 EST)
• Re: eepro cmd_wait Andrey Savochkin (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:17:31 EST)
• Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce Gerhard Mack (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:21:15 EST)
• Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Mogens Kjaer (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:32:08 EST)
• Re: console spin_lock Andrew Morton (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:42:59 EST)
• Re: eepro cmd_wait Simon Huggins (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:42:50 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Peter Samuelson (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:50:12 EST)
• Re: Documenting stat(2) Felix von Leitner (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:56:35 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 07:56:55 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Xavier Bestel (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:01:42 EST)
• Re: eepro cmd_wait Andrey Savochkin (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:03:09 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:06:46 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:18:09 EST)
• cddrive problem in Toshiba Laptop with 2.4.0-test11 kernel archan (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:24:24 EST)
• IRQ routing problem - SMP related? J.W. Hoogervorst (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:25:22 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:29:44 EST)
• RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Laramie Leavitt (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:00:19 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tim Fletcher (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:03:23 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Joel Franco Guzmán (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:31:22 EST)
• [PF_PACKET] and failed checksums James Stevenson (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:34:08 EST)
• Efficient 3060 Driver Zaborowski, Edward, SrA, AFPCA/SRW (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:34:47 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Mike Dresser (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:40:56 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:57:11 EST)
• rsync + ssh fail on raid; okay on 2.2.x Nick Urbanik (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:02:08 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Joel Franco Guzmán (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:30:09 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Joel Franco Guzmán (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:34:40 EST)
• patch: enabling RDPMC: bit 8 in CR4 (PCE) Tuukka Toivonen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:38:20 EST)
• [OT] Re: rsync + ssh fail on raid; okay on 2.2.x Tobias Ringstrom (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:45:57 EST)
• Re: Documenting stat(2) dmeyer@dmeyer.net (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:54:31 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Stefan Ring (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 10:58:30 EST)
• ACPI slows down the system (2.4.0) Eugenio Jimenez (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:00:26 EST)
• Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Scott A. Sibert (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:02:52 EST)
• Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Trond Myklebust (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:10:58 EST)
• [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Antony Suter (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:13:25 EST)
• Re: quota and 2.4.0-ac9 Jan Kara (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:18:27 EST)
• NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0 Scott A. Sibert (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:20:16 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:24:12 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:36:04 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Larry McVoy (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:36:55 EST)
• [PATCH] udf writepage UnlockPage Hugh Dickins (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:39:18 EST)
• [PATCH] pcnet32.c ARM support & AM79C973 improvements Eli Carter (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:46:13 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:49:38 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:51:19 EST)
• Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Mogens Kjaer (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:52:21 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Balazic (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:55:49 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:04:56 EST)
• Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Terrence Martin (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:15:59 EST)
• Re: patch: enabling RDPMC: bit 8 in CR4 (PCE) Maciej W. Rozycki (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:14:41 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:32:20 EST)
• Re: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0 Scott A. Sibert (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:38:56 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Zach Brown (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:49:28 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:50:23 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Andre Hedrick (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:40:33 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? idalton@ferret.phonewave.net (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:59:06 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:04:33 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Matthew Fredrickson (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:13:56 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Peter Samuelson (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:14:39 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Mike Galbraith (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:14:44 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:20:16 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:24:48 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:29:04 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] pcnet32.c ARM support & AM79C973 improvements Eli Carter (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:37:35 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:50:02 EST)
• 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Marcelo Tosatti (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:17:13 EST)
• Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux. Eric W. Biederman (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 11:18:25 EST)
• Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 Marcelo Tosatti (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 12:25:54 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:58:11 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:42:03 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:38:02 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:43:47 EST)
• Re: Documenting stat(2) Igmar Palsenberg (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:52:02 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:45:13 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:45:45 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tim Fletcher (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:49:36 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Rick Jones (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:51:41 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:52:33 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:59:11 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Szabolcs Szakacsits (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:18:38 EST)
• [PATCH] via82cxxx_audio rui.sousa@conexant.com (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:23:50 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:11:12 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:24:41 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:33:37 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:37:10 EST)
• Re: (2.4.0->2.4.1-pre8) config problem with PCMCIA causing link error Derek Wildstar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:36:57 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:44:32 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:44:57 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:30:22 EST)
• *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 0.9.1 beta2 available at www.sistina.com (fwd) Michael J. Declerck (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:43:35 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:50:42 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Matti Aarnio (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 15:53:16 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:04:28 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Albert D. Cahalan (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:12:48 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:14:11 EST)
• Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 Bill Crawford (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:32:24 EST)
• Re: [BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt Jean-Marc Saffroy (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:31:16 EST)
• Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 David Ford (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:46:40 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Mo McKinlay (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:30:10 EST)
• kernel 2.4, iproute2 and routing rules that refuse to match Andrew (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:51:28 EST)
• ERR in /proc/interrupts Jorge Boncompte \(DTI2\) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:54:24 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:57:20 EST)
• Re: console spin_lock Russell King (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:50:15 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:54:32 EST)
• Re: ERR in /proc/interrupts Tim Walberg (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:10:00 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:18:48 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:20:47 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:16:51 EST)
• Re: ERR in /proc/interrupts Timur Tabi (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:21:58 EST)
• RE: ERR in /proc/interrupts Jorge Boncompte \(DTI2\) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:31:38 EST)
• Re: ERR in /proc/interrupts Timur Tabi (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:41:55 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:49:05 EST)
• Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Tim Wright (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:50:01 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Steven Cole (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:52:01 EST)
• Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? John O'Donnell (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:19:31 EST)
• RE: ERR in /proc/interrupts Jorge Boncompte \(DTI2\) (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:58:31 EST)
• test, ignore Jeremy M. Dolan (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:01:23 EST)
• [PATCH] i91uscsi.c misreads BIOS settings Trevor Hemsley (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:12:18 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? David Weinehall (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 17:55:17 EST)
• Re: rsync + ssh fail on raid; okay on 2.2.x Nick Urbanik (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:32:10 EST)
• more via-rhine problems. Mike A. Harris (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:16:56 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Marcelo Tosatti (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 16:49:00 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Howard Johnson (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:42:25 EST)
• multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:53:11 EST)
• Re: Subtle MM bug Rik van Riel (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 06:48:26 EST)
• Linux MegaRAID Driver Version 1.14b Release Venkatesh Ramamurthy (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:58:22 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:16:29 EST)
• Re: APIC errors Jorge Nerin (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 14:17:52 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:26:16 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Olivier Galibert (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:27:58 EST)
• RE: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (fwd) Andre Hedrick (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:30:04 EST)
• Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? Felix von Leitner (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:36:49 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:18:01 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Gerhard Mack (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:43:15 EST)
• Re: Linux MegaRAID Driver Version 1.14b Release Alberto Bertogli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:41:43 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:52:25 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:59:26 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mark Hahn (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:00:16 EST)
• Re: Documenting stat(2) Mike Castle (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:00:23 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:51:01 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:08:52 EST)
• typo in buffer_busy macro in fs/buffer.c ?? Steven Ellmore (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:11:14 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:14:01 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update John Clemens (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:14:38 EST)
• Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? H. Peter Anvin (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:17:47 EST)
• Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 Rik van Riel (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 19:19:08 EST)
• Re: console spin_lock James Simmons (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:23:11 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:23:44 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:30:41 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:35:02 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:34:35 EST)
• Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups Bob Frey (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:41:30 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Davide Libenzi (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:38:30 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Jens Axboe (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:40:23 EST)
• Modifying TCP implementation in Linux Kernel? gsdrahei@xenon.cs.adelaide.edu.au (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:43:49 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Marcelo Tosatti (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 18:51:03 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:46:10 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Jens Axboe (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:43:51 EST)
• Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? Torrey Hoffman (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:47:55 EST)
• Hang when booting 2.4.0/2.4.1-pre8 on Compaq 1850R with SMART 3200 Ian Macdonald (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:48:35 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:48:21 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:53:40 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre8 video/ohci1394 compile problem ebi4 (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 20:52:40 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Andi Kleen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:08:25 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Szabolcs Szakacsits (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:23:25 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Jens Axboe (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:10:04 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Jens Axboe (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:13:03 EST)
• Re: Hang when booting 2.4.0/2.4.1-pre8 on Compaq 1850R with SMART 3200 egger@suse.de (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:39:21 EST)
• Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 bsuparna@in.ibm.com (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:35:41 EST)
• pppoe in 2.4.0 Martin Hicks (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:45:26 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] dean gaudet (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:46:49 EST)
• PROBLEM: Kernel crash with cron/mail? Jon Eisenstein (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:58:40 EST)
• Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Brad Felmey (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 21:54:03 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] dean gaudet (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:03:02 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] dean gaudet (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:16:05 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] dean gaudet (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:25:36 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] dean gaudet (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:35:27 EST)
• Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? David Ford (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:53:32 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] David Ford (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 22:56:30 EST)
• Network response time issue Paul Hancock (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 23:23:10 EST)
• Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Brad Felmey (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 23:24:54 EST)
• Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? David Ford (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 23:35:37 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 03:14:12 EST)
• Re: Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? Bill Nottingham (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:24:10 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Szabolcs Szakacsits (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:49:37 EST)
• [2.4.1-pre8] MPP related OPPS Aaron Tiensivu (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:58:23 EST)
• Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 Ian Macdonald (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:10:30 EST)
• Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 Daniel Mehrmnann (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:24:46 EST)
• Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 Daniel Mehrmnann (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:34:05 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Rogerio Brito (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:42:13 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Linus Torvalds (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:55:59 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Alan Cox (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 01:57:32 EST)
• [BUG]: 2.4.1-pre8: Wierd lockup with /proc based functions (?) Shawn Starr (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 02:34:31 EST)
• Re: pre5 VM feedback.. Marcelo Tosatti (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:51:01 EST)
• Re: pre5 VM feedback.. Marcelo Tosatti (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 00:57:03 EST)
• More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Holger Kiehl (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 02:47:23 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] via82cxxx_audio David Riley (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 03:05:38 EST)
• Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups David Woodhouse (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 04:30:50 EST)
• Inconsistent cache size reporting.? Dag Bakke (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 03:26:27 EST)
• Continuing OOP's... J.Brown (Ender/Amigo) (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 04:47:14 EST)
• Re: Documenting stat(2) Andreas Schwab (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 05:18:56 EST)
• block size for quotas? Mike Glover (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 05:02:43 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 05:13:35 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andre Hedrick (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 05:55:57 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd) Rogier Wolff (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 05:58:03 EST)
• Warnings on compiling 2.4.1-pre8 Jason Saunders (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:15:27 EST)
• More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Manfred Spraul (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:18:05 EST)
• Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Holger Kiehl (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:36:33 EST)
• Re: Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 David Santinoli (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:38:47 EST)
• Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Manfred Spraul (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 06:59:56 EST)
• Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Nils Rennebarth (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 07:02:16 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Maciej W. Rozycki (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 07:24:14 EST)
• Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Holger Kiehl (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 07:49:28 EST)
• Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 Martin Hicks (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 08:00:40 EST)
• 2.4 on Cobalt hardware Steve Hill (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 08:23:12 EST)
• (no subject) Robert Kaiser (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 08:37:02 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Kai Henningsen (Thu Jan 18 2001 - 13:46:00 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Mo McKinlay (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:19:45 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd) Andrea Arcangeli (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:27:18 EST)
• sched_test_yield benchmark Bill Hartner (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:30:55 EST)
• Re: Michael Rothwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:33:40 EST)
• Re: your mail Steve Hill (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:37:42 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:39:12 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] sched_test_yield benchmark Andi Kleen (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:52:31 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Vojtech Pavlik (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:53:33 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Mo McKinlay (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 09:59:45 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:11:23 EST)
• [Off-Topic] Support For 1 Ghz on Tyan Trinity 400 Jordan (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:11:47 EST)
• TLB IPI error J . A . Magallon (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:17:38 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Mo McKinlay (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:20:44 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:25:52 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:44:57 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Hubertus Franke (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:47:06 EST)
• Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Andrew Scott (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:55:29 EST)
• [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 10:56:10 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:04:41 EST)
• 2.4.0 crash [bdflush?] Igor Mozetic (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:06:15 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update David Lang (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:06:37 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Mo McKinlay (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:07:47 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:13:37 EST)
• Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Christoph Hellwig (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:25:03 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Hubertus Franke (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:30:04 EST)
• Re: 2.4 on Cobalt hardware Robert Kaiser (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:20:00 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update nick@snowman.net (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:33:34 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Mo McKinlay (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:33:51 EST)
• Re: sched_test_yield benchmark Davide Libenzi (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:35:55 EST)
• How come top and /proc/meminfo on 2.4.0 says 0K shared? Ian S. Nelson (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:39:13 EST)
• [2.4.1-pre8] MPP related OPPS Manfred Spraul (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:40:52 EST)
• Re: How come top and /proc/meminfo on 2.4.0 says 0K shared? Andi Kleen (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:46:08 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Hubertus Franke (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:47:52 EST)
• class handles J.D. Hollis (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:49:44 EST)
• missing check after kmalloc in drivers/video/sbus.c and not only Vladimir V. Klenov (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:59:41 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Tim Wright (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:06:03 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:11:04 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Rogier Wolff (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:23:06 EST)
• Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock Christoph Rohland (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:44:44 EST)
• Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Leslie Donaldson (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:40:16 EST)
• RE: Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? Torrey Hoffman (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:47:00 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:52:53 EST)
• Re: Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? Bill Nottingham (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:53:10 EST)
• Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Justin T. Gibbs (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:56:49 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Hubertus Franke (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:03:05 EST)
• Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Leslie Donaldson (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:05:45 EST)
• Don't mix reiserfs and RAID5 in linux-2.4.1-pre8, severe corruption Edward (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:27:02 EST)
• matroxfb mkloppstech@freenet.de (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:18:38 EST)
• oops mkloppstech@freenet.de (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:00:31 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:18:04 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update bert hubert (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:52:26 EST)
• Re: [reiserfs-list] Don't mix reiserfs and RAID5 in linux-2.4.1-pre8, severe corruption Ed Tomlinson (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 13:59:45 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:07:56 EST)
• Re: matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:38:32 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:03:19 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:18:00 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:32:30 EST)
• Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups Gérard Roudier (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 14:37:57 EST)
• PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Michael Lindner (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:47:12 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:49:21 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 15:54:00 EST)
• Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Jeff Hartmann (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:00:28 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:13:27 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:20:59 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:45:09 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:51:35 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Matthew Fredrickson (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:54:35 EST)
• Re: Incorrect module init message.. Pavel Machek (Sat Jan 01 2000 - 00:06:12 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek (Fri Dec 31 1999 - 21:10:33 EST)
• RE: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 gmo@broadcom.com (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 16:59:28 EST)
• Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Pavel Machek (Fri Dec 31 1999 - 21:02:20 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Davide Libenzi (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:03:06 EST)
• Re: ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded Rusty Russell (Tue Jan 16 2001 - 21:13:28 EST)
• 2.2.18 and mkraid Michael Rothwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:18:01 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:18:44 EST)
• [patch] smbfs cache rewrite for 2.4.1-pre Urban Widmark (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:27:08 EST)
• Re: [BUG]: 2.4.1-pre8: Wierd lockup with /proc based functions (?) Shawn Starr (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:31:47 EST)
• fs/readdir.c:fillonedir() vs. fs/readdir.c:filldir() William Taber (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:37:38 EST)
• Re: IDE-Floppy and devfs Andreas Franck (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:56:46 EST)
• Coding Style Mark I Manning IV (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:59:55 EST)
• RE: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available David Schwartz (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:20:29 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Davide Libenzi (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:24:41 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Chris Wedgwood (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:31:39 EST)
• Re: Incorrect module init message.. Mike A. Harris (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 17:46:07 EST)
• Re: Ibcs2 or abi for kernel 2.4 John O'Donnell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:34:32 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:35:21 EST)
• Re: 2.2.18 and mkraid Tim Moore (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 18:42:46 EST)
• Re: Coding Style David Ford (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:09:09 EST)
• Re: matroxfb mkloppstech@freenet.de (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:20:48 EST)
• Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x safemode (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:33:21 EST)
• Re: Coding Style Albert D. Cahalan (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:46:42 EST)
• Re: Coding Style John Cavan (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:26:01 EST)
• Linux 2.4.0-ac10 Alan Cox (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:33:11 EST)
• 2.4.0 repeatable opps Gregory Maxwell (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:08:30 EST)
• Linux 2.4.0-ac10 build errors Steven Cole (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:20:43 EST)
• 2.4.0-ac10 patching issue Frank Davis (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:18:59 EST)
• [RFC] generic IO write clustering Marcelo Tosatti (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 19:34:44 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-ac10 patching issue Jeff Garzik (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:25:38 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Michael Lindner (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:30:45 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac10 build errors Jeff Garzik (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:27:44 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac10 build errors Steven Cole (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:33:21 EST)
• -ac10 compile error Billy Harvey (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:53:06 EST)
• Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Leslie Donaldson (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:48:25 EST)
• Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Rik van Riel (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 21:58:38 EST)
• Re: -ac10 compile error Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:14:53 EST)
• RE: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available David Schwartz (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 22:27:19 EST)
• [PATCH] 802.1Q VLAN for Linux Ben Greear (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 23:33:40 EST)
• Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Marcelo Tosatti (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:52:36 EST)
• boot.img & initrd.img Linux Admin (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 23:16:06 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Michael Lindner (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 23:37:22 EST)
• Kernel is compiled but LILO wont boot it... Gregg Lloyd (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 00:32:14 EST)
• Re: Coding Style Linus Torvalds (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 00:34:42 EST)
• Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Johannes Erdfelt (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 00:38:12 EST)
• How do I compile a PPPoE client right into the kernel? Simon Liu (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 00:44:08 EST)
• Re: Coding Style Linus Torvalds (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 01:29:35 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Michael Lindner (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 01:54:23 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre9 fails to compile drm r128 as module Albert Cranford (Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:49:27 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Chris Wedgwood (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 02:07:27 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Michael Lindner (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 02:46:28 EST)
• Re: Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x Peter Horton (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 03:38:12 EST)
• Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? Andre Hedrick (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 03:45:33 EST)
• [PATCH] : Sound module locking - uart401 Chris Rankin (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 04:00:27 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Dan Maas (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 04:41:32 EST)
• [2.4.1-p8 More MPPP oops] Aaron Tiensivu (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 04:48:09 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Russell King (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 03:28:20 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Bernd Eckenfels (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 05:53:25 EST)
• Re: Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? Eric Lammerts (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 05:55:24 EST)
• [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/drivers/usb/serial/mct_u232.c usb_device_id table broken by new format Adam J. Richter (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:04:30 EST)
• Re: rsync + ssh fail on raid; okay on 2.2.x Nick Urbanik (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:48:59 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Martin MaD Douda (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 07:26:08 EST)
• Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Matthias Schniedermeyer (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:26:37 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Bjorn Wesen (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:39:20 EST)
• Re: [reiserfs-list] Don't mix reiserfs and RAID5 in linux-2.4.1-pre8, severe corruption Hans Reiser (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 07:39:36 EST)
• Re: Warnings on compiling 2.4.1-pre8 Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 09:22:29 EST)
• oops, continued mkloppstech@freenet.de (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 08:47:18 EST)
• oops, signal 11 mkloppstech@freenet.de (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 07:46:50 EST)
• [PATCH] two comment typos, kernel 2.4.0 Ulrich Kunitz (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:26:05 EST)
• Re: Coding Style Anton Altaparmakov (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:32:51 EST)
• 2.4.0 i386: Why free_xxx_slow() instead free_xxx_fast()? Ulrich Kunitz (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:33:41 EST)
• Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups Stephen Kitchener (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:54:22 EST)
• Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Christoph Hellwig (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:57:58 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style profmakx.fmp@gmx.de (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:19:17 EST)
• Serious file system corruption with RAID5+SMP and kernels above 2.4.0 Otto Meier (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:23:27 EST)
• Re: Inconsistent cache size reporting.? Janos Farkas (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:26:10 EST)
• Re: kernel 2.4, iproute2 and routing rules that refuse to match Matthew G. Marsh (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:24:15 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre9 fails to compile drm r128 as module Linus Torvalds (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:38:17 EST)
• [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Alan Chandler (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:14:04 EST)
• Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Marcelo Tosatti (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:24:40 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Michael Lindner (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:26:41 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Johannes Erdfelt (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:34:42 EST)
• lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 andersg@0x63.nu (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:41:06 EST)
• Re: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 Jens Taprogge (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 08:33:29 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:28:04 EST)
• Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Marcelo Tosatti (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 11:00:24 EST)
• RE: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 Carles Pina i Estany (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:05:49 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Andre Hedrick (Thu Jan 20 2011 - 12:51:03 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Manfred Spraul (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:00:21 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Johannes Erdfelt (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:08:49 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Abramo Bagnara (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:14:08 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:03:43 EST)
• Re: lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 Andrea Arcangeli (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:25:53 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:23:20 EST)
• Re: Documenting stat(2) Igmar Palsenberg (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:39:52 EST)
• Re: Serious file system corruption with RAID5+SMP and kernels above2.4.0 Holger Kiehl (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:42:04 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Alan Chandler (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:45:10 EST)
• Re: lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 Jens Axboe (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:50:27 EST)
• Re: Serious file system corruption with RAID5+SMP and kernels above2.4.0 John Jasen (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:50:40 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 13:53:42 EST)
• Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Christoph Hellwig (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:05:15 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:05:45 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:26:52 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:30:23 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:39:30 EST)
• Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimentalpatch] UHCI updates) David Brownell (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:43:51 EST)
• Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Marcelo Tosatti (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 12:55:33 EST)
• Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? Shawn Starr (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:50:16 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Kai Henningsen (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 09:56:00 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Kai Henningsen (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 10:36:00 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:39:36 EST)
• Oops in 2.2.17 James Brents (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:56:34 EST)
• Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? Gregory Maxwell (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 14:59:24 EST)
• Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? Shawn Starr (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:16:32 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:22:14 EST)
• Re: Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x Peter Horton (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:56:08 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:56:41 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:56:15 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:01:54 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:05:21 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mo McKinlay (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:10:33 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:20:21 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Guus Sliepen (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:31:11 EST)
• Re: Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x safemode (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:32:36 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:20:57 EST)
• md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( Dave Cinege (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:34:07 EST)
• Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( Sandy Harris (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:58:56 EST)
• Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? H. Peter Anvin (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:13:55 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Edgar Toernig (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 16:58:10 EST)
• Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( Andi Kleen (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:28:51 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:24:02 EST)
• Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( Dave Cinege (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:39:46 EST)
• 2.4 and ipmasq modules Aaron Lehmann (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:46:16 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Andre Hedrick (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 17:57:07 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Lincoln Dale (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:09:30 EST)
• Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? Andre Hedrick (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:06:10 EST)
• Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? H. Peter Anvin (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:12:00 EST)
• Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( Dave Cinege (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:21:25 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Daniel Stone (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:32:15 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] James Sutherland (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:27:35 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Aaron Lehmann (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:34:03 EST)
• Kernel 2.4.x & 2.4.1-preX Latency results Shawn Starr (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:39:31 EST)
• Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? Andre Hedrick (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:40:19 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Alan Chandler (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:55:13 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Chris Wedgwood (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:02:26 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Daniel Stone (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:08:00 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac10 Andrzej Krzysztofowicz (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:06:58 EST)
• Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:05:27 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Aaron Lehmann (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:08:43 EST)
• Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:10:45 EST)
• Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 Tobias Burnus (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:21:46 EST)
• Re: Kernel 2.4.x & 2.4.1-preX Latency results - Based on 2.4.1-pre9 Shawn Starr (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:20:22 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Doug McNaught (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:22:11 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:25:45 EST)
• Re: Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 Jeff Garzik (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:30:05 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Dan Maas (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:35:12 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:33:20 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Chris Wedgwood (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:34:33 EST)
• Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? Jens Axboe (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:42:21 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Michael Lindner (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:22:24 EST)
• Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups Bob Frey (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:32:43 EST)
• RE: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available David Schwartz (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:29:29 EST)
• RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Schwartz (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:29:29 EST)
• PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre9 does not compile on r128.c Pierre C. (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:45:16 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre9 does not compile on r128.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 19:04:47 EST)
• [OT] Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules J Sloan (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 20:55:17 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 21:03:19 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules John Jasen (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 21:24:39 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 21:42:46 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Michael Lindner (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 22:20:45 EST)
• [PATCH] Update URL for hdparm in Configure.help André Dahlqvist (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 22:41:05 EST)
• [PATCH] Add help text for ATI Radeon André Dahlqvist (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 22:54:35 EST)
• Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Keith Owens (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:09:04 EST)
• PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers David Luyer (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 23:54:56 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:10:50 EST)
• Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? Andre Hedrick (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:36:25 EST)
• Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? H. Peter Anvin (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:40:09 EST)
• Re: Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? Andre Hedrick (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:44:30 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Admin Mailing Lists (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:50:19 EST)
• rwsemaphores and modules Paul Mackerras (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:53:04 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Mike A. Harris (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 00:58:07 EST)
• kernel 2.4.0 with 3c509 (patch included) Xiaoyong Wu (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 01:41:05 EST)
• Re: eepro100 error messages Andrey Savochkin (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 01:45:05 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Josh Myer (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 02:07:59 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Alan Olsen (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 02:20:34 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Russell King (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:15:28 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Albert D. Cahalan (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 02:27:24 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Paul Jakma (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 02:47:30 EST)
• Re: Coding Style Matthias Andree (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 21:00:05 EST)
• [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/include/linux/acpi.h broke acpid compilation Adam J. Richter (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 03:23:19 EST)
• Re: Coding Style george anzinger (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 03:24:19 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Manfred Spraul (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 03:36:42 EST)
• Problems with Askey TView CPH061 grabber board under bttv STiNG of DEATH (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 04:31:13 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 04:46:06 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 04:52:36 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:02:15 EST)
• Re: krnl newbie: problems with EXPORT_SYMBOL() Keith Owens (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:21:57 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Alan Chandler (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:51:12 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Russell King (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:51:15 EST)
• Re: Problems with Askey TView CPH061 grabber board under bttv Gerd Knorr (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 05:44:25 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Vojtech Pavlik (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 06:54:36 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Manfred Spraul (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 06:49:16 EST)
• the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch] Bernd Eckenfels (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 07:07:45 EST)
• Re: Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x Vojtech Pavlik (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 06:40:30 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 06:44:52 EST)
• kernel hangs on CD-R HP8100i if compiled w/ VIA IDE support. Henryk Paluch (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 07:28:00 EST)
• kernel hangs on CD-R HP8100i if compiled w/ VIA IDE support. Henryk Paluch (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 07:34:09 EST)
• Re: Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 egger@suse.de (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 07:54:34 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Jan Niehusmann (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 08:04:33 EST)
• Re: Q: natsemi.c spinlocks Jeff Garzik (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 09:38:21 EST)
• [PATCH] Re: Q: natsemi.c spinlocks Jeff Garzik (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 09:43:01 EST)
• display problem with matroxfb f5ibh (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 09:48:44 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/include/linux/acpi.h broke acpid compilation John Fremlin (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 11:05:20 EST)
• [PATCH] include/linux/rtc.h tiny typo John Fremlin (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 11:10:05 EST)
• Getting the number of 512-byte sectors? Anton Altaparmakov (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 11:16:31 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Vojtech Pavlik (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 11:32:51 EST)
• Re: Getting the number of 512-byte sectors? Anton Altaparmakov (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:05:07 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Johannes Erdfelt (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:37:31 EST)
• Re: Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? Jesse Pollard (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:47:17 EST)
• Re: multi-queue scheduler update Jesse Pollard (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:49:52 EST)
• Re: Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? Doug McNaught (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 12:54:11 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:00:05 EST)
• 2.4.0 CDROM problem, ILLEGAL REQUEST Gregory T. Norris (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:05:12 EST)
• Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? Chris Mason (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:09:53 EST)
• Re: Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 idalton@ferret.phonewave.net (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:23:15 EST)
• Re: Ethernet drivers: SiS 900, Netgear FA311 Jeff Garzik (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:33:42 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion David D.W. Downey (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:39:38 EST)
• 2.4.1pre8 Oops Jeff Lightfoot (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:41:41 EST)
• Re: boot.img & initrd.img David D.W. Downey (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:42:41 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion David D.W. Downey (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:46:10 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 13:37:49 EST)
• Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Gregory McLean (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 15:17:50 EST)
• Re: more via-rhine problems. Urban Widmark (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 15:38:26 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Andre Hedrick (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 15:49:40 EST)
• [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Neil Brown (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 15:47:42 EST)
• Re: more via-rhine problems. Mike A. Harris (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:07:11 EST)
• [ANN] POSIX timer patch for 2.4.0 Robert H. de Vries (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:06:45 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Manfred Spraul (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:14:13 EST)
• Re: oops David Woodhouse (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:18:52 EST)
• RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? LA Walsh (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 16:22:02 EST)
• Re: Ibcs2 or abi for kernel 2.4 David Woodhouse (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 17:10:15 EST)
• 2.2.17 vs 2.4.0-ac4/8. Is this normal? piernas@ditec.um.es (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 23:10:26 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Mo McKinlay (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 17:40:34 EST)
• 2.4.1pre9 Oops (was Re: 2.4.1pre8 Oops) Jeff Lightfoot (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 17:52:18 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Woodhouse (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:21:28 EST)
• Problems with sound card and NIC Keven Belanger (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:14:43 EST)
• Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.xkernels? Shawn Starr (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:25:18 EST)
• 2.4.x: CONFIG_IDEDMA_NEW_DRIVE_LISTINGS paradox/doc. bug Barry K. Nathan (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:27:14 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Bernd Eckenfels (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:18:23 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Dan Hopper (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:12:29 EST)
• Re: display problem with matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:18:51 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Admin Mailing Lists (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:23:40 EST)
• RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Dunlap, Randy (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:26:50 EST)
• Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Nigel Gamble (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 19:54:47 EST)
• Re: Getting the number of 512-byte sectors? Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 20:31:04 EST)
• Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Paul Barton-Davis (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 20:49:05 EST)
• Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Nigel Gamble (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 21:21:05 EST)
• Re: Incorrect module init message.. Trevor Hemsley (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:00:47 EST)
• Interface statistics for Bonding bug in 2.4 Chris Chabot (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:56:44 EST)
• Re: the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch] Goswin Brederlow (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 21:43:35 EST)
• Resolved: FAIL: 2.2.18 + AA-VM-global-7 + serial 5.05 Matthias Andree (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 21:53:37 EST)
• Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 Marcelo Tosatti (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 20:20:13 EST)
• coprocessor_segment_overrun Tom (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 22:12:25 EST)
• Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 J Sloan (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 22:31:46 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Duncan Laurie (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 23:54:23 EST)
• Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Rainer Mager (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 00:17:53 EST)
• Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Leslie Donaldson (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 00:30:13 EST)
• Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Mike Galbraith (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 01:06:06 EST)
• Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Michael Rothwell (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:19:43 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Neil Brown (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 01:37:10 EST)
• Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Russell King (Sun Jan 21 2001 - 18:11:56 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Re: Q: natsemi.c spinlocks Donald Becker (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:06:11 EST)
• Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? David Woodhouse (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:34:09 EST)
• Firewall netlink question... Scaramanga (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:33:43 EST)
• Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Rogier Wolff (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 02:53:13 EST)
• RE: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Rainer Mager (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:03:54 EST)
• patch: 2.4.0/2.5.0: nanoseconds time resolution Ulrich Windl (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:10:29 EST)
• Running "make install" runs lilo on my Athlon but not my Pentium II. Miles Lane (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:19:41 EST)
• [PATCH] ISA PnP support for the SMC EtherEZ sluncho@mirizma.org (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:30:34 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Re: Q: natsemi.c spinlocks Manfred Spraul (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:51:34 EST)
• Re: the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch] Bernd Eckenfels (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:32:34 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Howard Johnson (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:54:18 EST)
• Re: Firewall netlink question... Philipp Matthias Hahn (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:46:03 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Helge Hafting (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:52:04 EST)
• Re: Firewall netlink question... Scaramanga (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:26:00 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 Oops Andrew Morton (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:36:42 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre9 Oops (was Re: 2.4.1pre8 Oops) Andrew Morton (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 05:43:58 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Hans Reiser (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 04:23:08 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Holger Kiehl (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 06:19:10 EST)
• Re: Firewall netlink question... Daniel Stone (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 06:28:41 EST)
• Re: Firewall netlink question... Scaramanga (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 06:58:26 EST)
• Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 Bernd Kaindl (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 07:20:22 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:00:08 EST)
• kernel BUG at file.c:79! (using vfat) Stefan Ring (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:02:15 EST)
• Proper OOPS report Tom (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:11:45 EST)
• Networking strangeness 2.4.0-ac9 and earlier John Cavan (Sun Jan 14 2001 - 12:03:56 EST)
• [patch] 2.4.0, 2.2.18: A critical problem with tty_io.c Maciej W. Rozycki (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:55:14 EST)
• Oops in 2.2.19pre7 Mike Frisch (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:03:04 EST)
• Re: md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( Ingo Oeser (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:09:01 EST)
• Re: Proper OOPS report Henrik Stokseth (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:39:35 EST)
• Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Barry K. Nathan (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:27:17 EST)
• Replicating Current Kernell Plinio Barraza (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 09:48:49 EST)
• Driver crash 2.4.0 nicstar.c Listuser AVA System (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:11:21 EST)
• lilo and removable media J . A . Magallon (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:12:03 EST)
• [PATCH] 8139too.c min frame size check Yuri Polyansky (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:36:17 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Hubertus Franke (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 08:35:03 EST)
• Hard freeze on 2.4.1pre9 during fsck Patrick Michael Kane (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:47:03 EST)
• kapm-idled and cpu heating ... Alan Schmitt (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:51:41 EST)
• Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Werner Almesberger (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:56:38 EST)
• RAID oops 2.4.0ac10 Mike Black (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:00:34 EST)
• Re: the remount problem [2.4.0] kind of solved [patch] Goswin Brederlow (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:09:44 EST)
• RE: [OT?] Coding Style Jonathan Earle (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:04:50 EST)
• Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Gregory McLean (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:15:45 EST)
• Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:17:22 EST)
• Freeze: atyfb & XFree4.0.1 Jan-Benedict Glaw (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:20:10 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Mike Harrold (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:19:53 EST)
• Re: lilo and removable media Patrizio Bruno (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:32:22 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Larry McVoy (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:22:54 EST)
• [patch] wait4-2.4.0-A0 Ingo Molnar (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:31:15 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Brian Gerst (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:32:31 EST)
• Re: APIC errors Maciej W. Rozycki (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:26:42 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:47:42 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Edward (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:36:30 EST)
• Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Keith Owens (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:30:36 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Davide Libenzi (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:58:50 EST)
• RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Dunlap, Randy (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:01:51 EST)
• hda: dma_intr: errors Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:09:15 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Gregory Maxwell (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:43:19 EST)
• RE: [Acpi] [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/include/linux/acpi.h broke ac pid compilation Grover, Andrew (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:51:18 EST)
• RE: [OT?] Coding Style Jonathan Earle (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:53:48 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Otto Meier (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:09:37 EST)
• Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Werner Almesberger (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:08:07 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Val Henson (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:13:44 EST)
• Re: Interface statistics for Bonding bug in 2.4 Thomas Davis (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:15:05 EST)
• more on scheduler benchmarks Mike Kravetz (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:17:38 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Lang (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:27:58 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Richard B. Johnson (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:29:05 EST)
• PROBLEM: raid assembly on 2.4.0-2.4.1-pre9 fails John Jasen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:35:15 EST)
• Re: more on scheduler benchmarks Davide Libenzi (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:37:34 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:54:00 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:44:13 EST)
• Re: [NFS] Help: 2.2.18 NFS is corrupting our files Trond Myklebust (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:57:46 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks Hubertus Franke (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:27:03 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks Bill Hartner (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:23:05 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Val Henson (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:37:07 EST)
• Re: [NFS] Help: 2.2.18 NFS is corrupting our files Patrick J. LoPresti (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:41:16 EST)
• Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Tim Wright (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:54:10 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Lang (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:01:23 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks Bill Hartner (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:07:21 EST)
• Re: Freeze: atyfb & XFree4.0.1 Geert Uytterhoeven (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:20:07 EST)
• Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Pete Elton (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:59:43 EST)
• Re: display problem with matroxfb f5ibh (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:11:51 EST)
• RE: [OT?] Coding Style Stephen Satchell (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:09:07 EST)
• Re: display problem with matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:20:44 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Mark I Manning IV (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 11:42:54 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] more on scheduler benchmarks Andi Kleen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:58:23 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Randy.Dunlap (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:05:02 EST)
• Re: Running "make install" runs lilo on my Athlon but not my Pentium II. Russell King (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:02:04 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Marcelo Tosatti (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 15:30:03 EST)
• Re: Proper OOPS report Russell King (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:50:38 EST)
• Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Russell King (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:47:58 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Russell King (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:39:08 EST)
• kernel BUG at slab.c:1542! (2.4.1-pre9) Jorge Nerin (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:23:04 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:30:54 EST)
• Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) Shawn Starr (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:37:20 EST)
• Re: [NFS] [CFT] Improved RPC congestion handling for 2.4.0 (and 2.2.18) H . J . Lu (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:37:40 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:42:25 EST)
• parallel mkfs on ia64 with 2.4.0 MEHTA,HIREN (A-SanJose,ex1) (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:45:07 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Russell King (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:42:06 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Mark I Manning IV (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 12:35:48 EST)
• Re: Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x Peter Horton (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:49:38 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:55:34 EST)
• Re: [NFS] [CFT] Improved RPC congestion handling for 2.4.0 (and 2.2.18) Trond Myklebust (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:00:29 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Glenn McGrath (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:16:49 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Jens Axboe (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:11:55 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Admin Mailing Lists (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:20:49 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/53c7xx.c error handling and cleanup (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:27:36 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:28:27 EST)
• [PATCH] general cleanup of drivers/scsi/NCR53c406a.c (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:29:54 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/aha1740.c: check request_region return code (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:31:27 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/3w-xxxx.c check_region -> request_region (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:33:21 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/aic7xxx.c: check_region -> request_region (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:34:45 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM H. Peter Anvin (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:35:14 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Jason Venner (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:35:11 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/cpqfcTSinit.c cleanup (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:35:57 EST)
• Re: [NFS] [CFT] Improved RPC congestion handling for 2.4.0 (and 2.2.18) H . J . Lu (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:36:38 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/fastlane.c check return code of request_irq (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:37:18 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/fd_mcs.c cleanup (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:38:56 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c: check_*_region -> request_*_region (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:40:26 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/hosts.c check kmalloc return codes (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:41:25 EST)
• Module Profiling Problem Chris K Cockrum (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:44:28 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/inia100.c cleanup (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:42:42 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/megaraid.c check ioremaps return code (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:45:20 EST)
• Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Duncan Laurie (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:46:24 EST)
• cardbus nic modules Wakko Warner (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:03:22 EST)
• Re: Freeze: atyfb & XFree4.0.1 Jan-Benedict Glaw (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:47:10 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Anton Altaparmakov (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 18:56:40 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Larry McVoy (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:01:10 EST)
• SCSI raid controllers David Lang (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:02:26 EST)
• ibmcam C-It usb Wakko Warner (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:15:27 EST)
• Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Paul Jakma (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:15:26 EST)
• BUG in modutils or drivers/isdn/hisax/ Ingo Oeser (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:31:55 EST)
• Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Bernd Eckenfels (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:50:27 EST)
• Odd Question: pc_keyb as a module? Jinnah Dylan Hosein (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:37:59 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Werner Almesberger (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 19:54:07 EST)
• 2.4.1-test10 Linus Torvalds (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 20:13:19 EST)
• Re: Odd Question: pc_keyb as a module? James Simmons (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 20:14:24 EST)
• RESEND: [ PATCH ] externalize (new) scsi timer function Matthew Jacob (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 20:19:49 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Rusty Russell (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 20:48:20 EST)
• RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Dunlap, Randy (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 20:52:23 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Aaron Lehmann (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:01:58 EST)
• Re: more on scheduler benchmarks Joe deBlaquiere (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:22:58 EST)
• Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? David Ford (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:47:35 EST)
• 2.2.18 / Oracle 8.1.6 or 8.1.7 any known problems? Daniels, Andrew (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 21:50:09 EST)
• Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!(2.4.1-pre9) David Ford (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:02:27 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 David Ford (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:08:39 EST)
• Re: oops, signal 11 Ralf Baechle (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:31:10 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Tim Hockin (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:01:36 EST)
• Re: Coding Style Ralf Baechle (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 03:24:42 EST)
• Re: Coding Style Mark I Manning IV (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 17:28:18 EST)
• Re: Coding Style adrian (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 22:56:19 EST)
• Re:2.2.18 / Oracle 8.1.6 or 8.1.7 any known problems? Svein Erik Brostigen (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 23:31:10 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andreas Dilger (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 23:47:51 EST)
• LILO wont boot my kernel image: More details... Gregg Lloyd (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 23:52:24 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Derek Wildstar (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:04:08 EST)
• problem with dd for floppy under 2.4.0 Thomas Molina (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:23:36 EST)
• Probably Off-topic Question... Alan Olsen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:40:50 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM H. Peter Anvin (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:23:33 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Marcelo Tosatti (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 23:37:29 EST)
• Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Russell King (Mon Jan 22 2001 - 16:55:23 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mike A. Harris (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 00:33:45 EST)
• Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Keith Owens (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:37:02 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Stephen Satchell (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:37:48 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Alan Olsen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:01:14 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Jeff Garzik (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:05:56 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] dean gaudet (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:20:08 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Daniel Stone (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:29:34 EST)
• Re: Firewall netlink question... Daniel Stone (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:33:48 EST)
• Re: patch: 2.4.0/2.5.0: nanoseconds time resolution Ulrich Windl (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:37:30 EST)
• AGPGART problems with VIA KX133 chipsets under 2.2.18/2.4.0 Michael Guntsche (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:33:25 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Helge Hafting (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:01:38 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] - filesystem corruption on soft RAID5 in 2.4.0+ Holger Kiehl (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 03:21:44 EST)
• Re: [NFS] Help: 2.2.18 NFS is corrupting our files Neil Brown (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:07:40 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Helge Hafting (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 03:37:41 EST)
• bootp starts before network device? Ookhoi (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 02:54:18 EST)
• Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:08:03 EST)
• Re: devfs breakage in 2.4.0 release Andris Pavenis (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 03:25:50 EST)
• RE: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Rainer Mager (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 03:37:46 EST)
• Re: PATCH: "Pass module parameters" to built-in drivers Richard Guenther (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:18:36 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Andy Galasso (Sat Jan 20 2001 - 03:39:50 EST)
• (no subject) Rajiv Majumdar (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:38:40 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:37:59 EST)
• Re: bootp starts before network device? David Woodhouse (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:42:51 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Trever L. Adams (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:03:26 EST)
• [2.4.1-p10] Multilink PPP crash fix Aaron Tiensivu (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 04:59:20 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Heikki Lindholm (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:22:44 EST)
• ioremap_nocache problem? Mark Mokryn (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:30:00 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Tigran Aivazian (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:36:36 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Patrizio Bruno (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:32:57 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Chmouel Boudjnah (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:40:45 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Tigran Aivazian (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:45:32 EST)
• 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors Anders Karlsson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:48:14 EST)
• NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] David Ford (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:48:16 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Chmouel Boudjnah (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:50:48 EST)
• winsock 2 Rajiv Majumdar (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:03:34 EST)
• Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] Matti Aarnio (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:56:36 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Andrew Morton (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:07:46 EST)
• xircom_tulip_cb reports wrong stats in /proc/net/dev Alessandro Suardi (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:59:35 EST)
• Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] David Ford (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:13:48 EST)
• Announce: modutils 2.4.2 is available Keith Owens (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:14:24 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Chmouel Boudjnah (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:18:11 EST)
• Re: BUG in modutils or drivers/isdn/hisax/ Karsten Keil (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:28:49 EST)
• Marking sectors on IDE drives as bad Wahlman, Petter (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:34:11 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors Keith Owens (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:43:34 EST)
• Re: problem with dd for floppy under 2.4.0 Mikael Pettersson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:08:54 EST)
• [OOPS] Daniel Stodden (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:14:16 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors Anders Karlsson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:16:11 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors Keith Owens (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:19:38 EST)
• Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] Matti Aarnio (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:25:50 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Steve Underwood (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:28:26 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors Anton Altaparmakov (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:29:17 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:29:07 EST)
• Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] David Ford (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:36:21 EST)
• Re: more on scheduler benchmarks Andrew Morton (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:45:58 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Andrew Morton (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:52:37 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Tigran Aivazian (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:47:59 EST)
• Re: 2.4.0-ac10 compile errors Anders Karlsson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:52:31 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Chmouel Boudjnah (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:05:36 EST)
• DMA vs PIO speeds... Guennadi V. Liakhovetski (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:09:14 EST)
• [2.4.1-pre10] conflicting declarations of sys_wait4() Martin Schimschak (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:18:28 EST)
• Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 NDias@sunglasshut.com (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:19:46 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? Tigran Aivazian (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:33:09 EST)
• Re: Proper OOPS report Bernd Schmidt (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:32:08 EST)
• limit on number of kmapped pages David Wragg (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 08:56:00 EST)
• Re: BUG in modutils or drivers/isdn/hisax/ Ingo Oeser (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:13:02 EST)
• Re: Proper OOPS report Tom (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:29:04 EST)
• Re: Proper OOPS report Tom (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:30:42 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Trever L. Adams (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:57:42 EST)
• Problem with Madge Tokenring (abyss.o) in 2.4.1-pre10 Bart Dorsey (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 09:42:34 EST)
• RE: Coding Style Jonathan Earle (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:07:10 EST)
• RE: 2.4.1-test10 Jonathan Earle (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:14:24 EST)
• [PATCH] Re: Problem with Madge Tokenring (abyss.o) in 2.4.1-pre10 Jeff Garzik (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:23:35 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Richard B. Johnson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:25:14 EST)
• Re: Marking sectors on IDE drives as bad Andreas Dilger (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:28:37 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Jeff Garzik (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:27:52 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre8/10 klogd taking 100% of CPU time -- bug? John Jasen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:34:10 EST)
• RE: [OT?] Coding Style Jonathan Earle (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:41:49 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:46:07 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Larry McVoy (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:58:05 EST)
• __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed. for 2.4.1-pre9 Yann Dupont (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:59:35 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Mike Harrold (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:00:30 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Nicolas Noble (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:17:15 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Georg Nikodym (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:14:17 EST)
• ICMP spoofing protection: Is this code sane? antirez (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:19:54 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Martin Josefsson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:18:38 EST)
• OOPS with 2.2.18 Pasi Kärkkäinen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:24:01 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Joe deBlaquiere (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:32:52 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mark I Manning IV (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 06:27:24 EST)
• Re: BUG in modutils or drivers/isdn/hisax/ Kai Germaschewski (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:42:23 EST)
• RE: [OT?] Coding Style Jesse Pollard (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:47:00 EST)
• Re: AGPGART problems with VIA KX133 chipsets under 2.2.18/2.4.0 Jeff Hartmann (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:51:03 EST)
• Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Timur Tabi (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:53:51 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] multi-queue scheduler update Jun Nakajima (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:49:27 EST)
• Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules Aaron Lehmann (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 11:56:33 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:08:50 EST)
• Re: [Lse-tech] multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:08:49 EST)
• Re: VIA chipset discussion Andre Hedrick (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:28:34 EST)
• Re: __alloc_pages: 3-order allocation failed. for 2.4.1-pre9 Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 10:46:41 EST)
• Network hang with 2.4.1-pre9 and 3c59x John Roll (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:40:58 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mike A. Harris (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:42:22 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style John Kodis (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:42:16 EST)
• Looking for a Linux expert--great job opportunity Kim Pelham (Wed Jan 24 2001 - 00:49:30 EST)
• Re: NETDEV timeout on tulips [was: Re: 2.4.1-test10] Jeff Garzik (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:57:45 EST)
• Re: [Dri-devel] Re: AGPGART problems with VIA KX133 chipsets under 2.2.18/2.4.0 Markus Hadwiger (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:58:34 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 07:43:33 EST)
• Re: Looking for a Linux expert--great job opportunity Christoph Hellwig (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:04:28 EST)
• using open() on a looping symlink with O_CREAT set fails incorrectly. Aaron Laffin (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:06:14 EST)
• M68K mac 2.2.18 doesn't compile William Thompson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:54:54 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Stephen Satchell (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:10:34 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) (win98 not honoring partitioning) Jason Venner (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:13:59 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Adam Lackorzynski (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:18:34 EST)
• Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Roman Zippel (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:12:36 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mike A. Harris (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:28:38 EST)
• Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock Hugh Dickins (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:28:13 EST)
• OOPS in 2.4.0-ac10 Nathan Walp (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:28:55 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:35:24 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Christopher Friesen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:05:59 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) (win98 not honoring partitioning) J Sloan (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:36:38 EST)
• Re: ioremap_nocache problem? Timur Tabi (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:38:42 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:41:43 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Ben Ford (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:42:51 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Alan Olsen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:58:39 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Georg Nikodym (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:44:37 EST)
• RE: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) [off topic now...] Torrey Hoffman (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:50:43 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Ben Ford (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 05:53:04 EST)
• Re: blk-13B Giuliano Pochini (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:05:13 EST)
• 2.4.0 statd trouble nbecker@fred.net (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:55:48 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Linus Torvalds (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:03:38 EST)
• Re: limit on number of kmapped pages Eric W. Biederman (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 13:23:46 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Matt D. Robinson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:26:12 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Andre Hedrick (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:27:02 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:48:24 EST)
• Under 2.4.0 I can mount same partition twice. Dan Graham (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:38:39 EST)
• swapfs for 2.4.1-pre J . A . Magallon (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 14:53:15 EST)
• 2.4.0 hangs with PIII i815e system Idan Sofer (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:54:20 EST)
• Re: M68K mac 2.2.18 doesn't compile Joshua M. Thompson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:06:21 EST)
• Re: Coding Style Boris Dragovic (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:05:46 EST)
• Re: AGPGART problems with VIA KX133 chipsets under 2.2.18/2.4.0 Wayne Whitney (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:05:00 EST)
• Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mike A. Harris (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:17:02 EST)
• Re: Under 2.4.0 I can mount same partition twice. Andreas Dilger (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:13:44 EST)
• RE: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) [off topic now...] Mike A. Harris (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:20:56 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Steven Cole (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:29:44 EST)
• Re: Probably Off-topic Question... Adam Fritzler (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:32:06 EST)
• 2.4 cpu usage... LA Walsh (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:32:55 EST)
• Re: display problem with matroxfb f5ibh (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:34:51 EST)
• Re: [Dri-devel] Re: AGPGART problems with VIA KX133 chipsets under 2.2.18/2.4.0 Jeff Hartmann (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:34:58 EST)
• Linux 2.2.16 through 2.2.18preX TCP hang bug triggered by rsync Dave Dykstra (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:42:14 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Jens Axboe (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 15:54:19 EST)
• 815e hang update. Idan Sofer (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:54:21 EST)
• changing mac address of eth alias David Weis (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:37:38 EST)
• [Announce] Version 1.8 of x86 performance counters driver Mikael Pettersson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:09:32 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style David Benfell (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:16:53 EST)
• Bug in IA64 bootsector code ? Adrian Glaubitz (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:16:36 EST)
• Big Bada Boom... Greg from Systems (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:22:30 EST)
• Big Bada Boom... Crapola... Greg from Systems (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:23:46 EST)
• PS/2 mouse problems in Linux 2.4.0 and 2.2.17 on KT133 chipset based motherboards. Dylan Griffiths (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:09:26 EST)
• Re: 2.4 cpu usage... Barry K. Nathan (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:37:32 EST)
• Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount, summary Tobias Ringstrom (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:39:22 EST)
• [PATCH] No VIA IDE DMA unless configured Tobias Ringstrom (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:46:14 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/53c7xx.c error handling and cleanup (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:58:12 EST)
• Re: display problem with matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 16:59:58 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] general cleanup of drivers/scsi/NCR53c406a.c (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:03:31 EST)
• Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Glenn McGrath (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:01:33 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/megaraid.c check ioremaps return code (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:07:35 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/fastlane.c check return code of request_irq (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:10:27 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/g_NCR5380.c: check_*_region -> request_*_region (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:11:57 EST)
• PACKET_MR_PROMISC doesn't set IFF_PROMISC Pekka Savola (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:12:35 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/inia100.c cleanup (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:15:30 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/qla1280.c check_region -> request->region (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:22:46 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-test10 Ed Tomlinson (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:20:45 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/qlogicfas.c: check_region -> request_region + cleanup (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:24:59 EST)
• [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/qlogicfc.c check_region -> request_region + cleanup (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:29:47 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/qlogicisp.c: return code from scsi_register (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:31:55 EST)
• RE: [OT?] Coding Style Jonathan Earle (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:22:04 EST)
• stripping symbols from modules MEHTA,HIREN (A-SanJose,ex1) (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:34:15 EST)
• [PATCH] drives/scsi/tmscsim.c: check_region -> request_region (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:42:30 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/u14-35f.c: check_region -> request_region (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:44:24 EST)
• 2.4.1-pre patches do no compile Carlo Scarfoglio (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:51:42 EST)
• [PATCH] drivers/scsi/wd7000.c: check_region -> request_region (241p9) Rasmus Andersen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:52:15 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.2.16 through 2.2.18preX TCP hang bug triggered by rsync Dave Dykstra (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 17:51:19 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre patches do no compile Shawn Starr (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:05:06 EST)
• Re: stripping symbols from modules Keith Owens (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:06:23 EST)
• unmapping inode? Michael Rothwell (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:07:29 EST)
• RE: stripping symbols from modules hiren_mehta@agilent.com (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:15:24 EST)
• Re: Problem with Madge Tokenring (abyss.o) in 2.4.1-pre10 Adam Fritzler (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:14:38 EST)
• Re: 2.4.1-pre patches do no compile Carlo Scarfoglio (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:18:44 EST)
• Modules not being found with 2.4.0 on a 486 based box C Sanjayan Rosenmund (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:23:57 EST)
• sigcontext on Linux-ppc in user space John Kacur (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:56:14 EST)
• Re: Modules not being found with 2.4.0 on a 486 based box Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:29:51 EST)
• Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Pete Elton (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:50:36 EST)
• Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? Sasi Peter (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 18:52:57 EST)
• Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:09:36 EST)
• Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... Linda Walsh (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:06:47 EST)
• RE: [OT?] Coding Style Stephen Satchell (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:07:26 EST)
• Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Andi Kleen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:10:11 EST)
• Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... Florin Andrei (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:15:51 EST)
• Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Cacophonix (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:19:08 EST)
• Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Pete Elton (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:27:21 EST)
• Re: 2.4 disk speed 66% slowdown... Andre Hedrick (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:26:40 EST)
• Re: Network hang with 2.4.1-pre9 and 3c59x Andrew Morton (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:40:26 EST)
• Re: limit on number of kmapped pages David Wragg (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:35:12 EST)
• Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? Sasi Peter (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:43:26 EST)
• Re: Turning off ARP in linux-2.4.0 Pete Elton (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:49:04 EST)
• monitoring I/O Michael McLeod (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:52:36 EST)
• Re: ioremap_nocache problem? David Wragg (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:50:20 EST)
• Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:58:51 EST)
• Re: monitoring I/O Nicholas Dronen (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:58:25 EST)
• Re: ioremap_nocache problem? David Wragg (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:01:29 EST)
• RE: Is this kernel related (signal 11)? Rainer Mager (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:56:00 EST)
• Re: display problem with matroxfb Petr Vandrovec (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:17:20 EST)
• Re: [OT?] Coding Style Steve Underwood (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:14:22 EST)
• Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:27:26 EST)
• Re: changing mac address of eth alias Ben Greear (Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:38:56 EST)