On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> BTW, the simmetry between getsockopt/setsockopt further bias how
> SIOCPUSH doesn't fit into the setsockopt options but it fits very well
> into the ioctl categorty instead. There's simply no state one can
> return via getsockopt for the SIOCPUSH functionality. It's not setting
> any option, it's just doing one thing that controls the I/O.
you convinced me. I guess i was just distracted by the common wisdom:
'ioctls are a hack'. But SIOCPUSH *IS* an 'IO control' after all :-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST