Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2

From: Igmar Palsenberg (maillist@chello.nl)
Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 17:57:28 EST


> The underlying problem is of course that all those sanity checks should
> be done in user space, not in the kernel.
>
> (See also ftp://icaftp.epfl.ch/pub/people/almesber/slides/tmp-tc.ps.gz
> The bitching starts on slide 11, some ideas for fixing the problem on
> slide 16, but heed the warning on slide 15.)
>
> Besides that, I agree that we have far too many EINVALs in the kernel.
> Maybe we should just record file name and line number of the EINVAL
> in *current and add an eh?(2) system call ;-)

I don't care about an error, but EINVAL is giving very confusing
errors.. Like finding your glasses when you're already have them on.

I like the h_errno solution, but that's another glibc change.

> - Werner

        Igmar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 21:00:16 EST