Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the asm-generic tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:05:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
> 
> from the asm-generic tree and commits:
> 
>   9f6c532f59b2 ("futex: Add sys_futex_wake()")
>   cb8c4312afca ("futex: Add sys_futex_wait()")
>   0f4b5f972216 ("futex: Add sys_futex_requeue()")
> 
> from the block tree.

These three commits are also in the tip tree.

> I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpWko6xUXUSw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature