Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000

[Bryan O'Donoghue]

On 29/01/15 15:32, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.logic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:22 PM
> > To: Ong, Boon Leong
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; H. Peter Anvin; x86@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andy Shevchenko; Ingo
> > Molnar
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000
> >
> > On 29/01/15 13:47, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
> > > Bryan,
> > >
> > > Once you have the next revision ready, I would like to test it on my end across
> > both Galileo Gen v1 & v2.
> > > Cheers,
> > > BL
> >
> > Andy/BL - thanks for taking the time to test.
> >
> > I may end up dropping the imr_del_range() tests based on index as a result of
> > changing the external interface as suggested by Ingo.
> It would be nice to have two variants (1) index based & (2) address based.

Understood. The direction from Ingo was to have address based external 
interface imr_del_range() and support an index based internal 
imr_clear() - internally.

So - in order to get test coverage - I'll move the self-test code back 
into the main IMR code

Not as pretty that way - but better coverage :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/