RE: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000

[Ong, Boon Leong]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.logic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:22 PM
>To: Ong, Boon Leong
>Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; H. Peter Anvin; x86@xxxxxxxxxx;
>dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andy Shevchenko; Ingo
>Molnar
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000
>
>On 29/01/15 13:47, Ong, Boon Leong wrote:
>> Bryan,
>>
>> Once you have the next revision ready, I would like to test it on my end across
>both Galileo Gen v1 & v2.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> BL
>
>Andy/BL - thanks for taking the time to test.
>
>I may end up dropping the imr_del_range() tests based on index as a result of
>changing the external interface as suggested by Ingo.
It would be nice to have two variants (1) index based & (2) address based. 

>
>If you guys have a clear preference to keep those tests shout now and I'll re-
>merge the imr_selftest code into the main chunk of IMR code.
Ok, once you have that ready, I will re-run the test on my end. 

>
>--
>BOD

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/