Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue
Date: Thu Jan 29 2015 - 11:12:50 EST
On 29/01/15 15:40, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
It would be nice to have two variants (1) index based & (2) address
based.
Understood. The direction from Ingo was to have address based external
interface imr_del_range() and support an index based internal
imr_clear() - internally.
So - in order to get test coverage - I'll move the self-test code back
into the main IMR code
Not as pretty that way - but better coverage :)
Talking to myself in public...
Second (third) thought - there's no advantage to moving the test code
back in - since imr_add_range() won't return the index anymore...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/