Re: openat(..., AT_UNLINKED) was Re: New copyfile system call - discussbefore LSF?

From: Ric Wheeler
Date: Sun Mar 31 2013 - 19:29:50 EST


On 03/31/2013 07:18 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!

Take a look at how many actively used filesystems out there that have
some variant of sillyrename(), and explain what you want to do in those
cases.
Well. Yes, there are non-unix filesystems around. You have to deal
with silly files on them, and this will not be different.
So this would be a local POSIX filesystem only solution to a problem
that has yet to be formulated?
Problem is "clasical create temp file then delete it" is racy. See the
archives. That is useful & common operation.
Which race are you concerned with exactly?

User wants to test for a file with name "foo.txt"

* create "foo.txt~" (or whatever)
* write contents into "foo.txt~"
* rename "foo.txt~" to "foo.txt"

Until rename is done, the file does not exists and is not complete.
You will potentially have a garbage file to clean up if the program
(or system) crashes, but that is not racy in a classic sense, right?
Well. If people rsync from you, they will start fetching incomplete
foo.txt~. Plus the garbage issue.

That is not racy, just garbage (not trying to be pedantic, just trying to understand). I can see that the "~" file is annoying, but we have dealt with it for a *long* time :)

Until it has the right name (on either the source or target system for rsync), it is not the file you are looking for.

This is more of a garbage clean up issue?
Also. Plus sometimes you want temporary "file" that is
deleted. Terminals use it for history, etc...

There you would have a race, you can create a file and unlink it of course and still write to it, but you would have a potential empty file issue?

Ric


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/