Re: PROBLEM: Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35,2.6.35.1 and later

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 12:12 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:41:08 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 23:02 -0400, tmhikaru@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >  The load average statistic is indeed broken somehow, and I
> > > did bisect it down to where the problem began, however there seems to be no
> > > performance problem related to it I can find. 
> > 
> > Chase, anything you can see broken with this stuff?
> 
> Peter, do you think it would be worthwile to test a kernel with the
> low load-averages in NOHZ=disable mode? The bisected commit claims to
> fix a NOHZ issue with the load average. So if the new figures are the
> correct ones, they should be somehow similar to the figures before
> with NOHZ? Or am I on the wrong track here?

No, that makes sense, but there is of course the distinct possibility
that the patch wrecked the !nohz path as well. So ideally you'd have to
compare NOHZ=n with this patch reverted and NOHZ=y with this patch in
place.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/