Re: [RFC patch] clean up swiotlb check in intel_iommu_init

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:11 +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> 
> Since swiotlb is an fall back option that might have
> initialized. We don't need to stop intel_iommu_init
> because of swiotlb..
> 
> Please review. If make sense, please apply.

It doesn't apply to the iommu-2.6.git tree.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/