Re: [PATCH] x86: pat cpu feature bit setting for known cpus

[Yinghai Lu]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:06 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>  >>
>  >>  By the way, I want to clarify: I didn't mean it was *intended* as
>  >>  vendor-lockin, just that it's an undesirable effect of this.
>  >
>  > if the PAT works, we may need to trim the memory according to MTRR, right?
>  >
>
>  That doesn't seem like it's specific to PAT?

could page table to  set WRBACK the range that is not covered by MTRR in e820..

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/