Re: [PATCH] x86: pat cpu feature bit setting for known cpus

[H. Peter Anvin]

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >  By the way, I want to clarify: I didn't mean it was *intended* as
> >  vendor-lockin, just that it's an undesirable effect of this.
>
> if the PAT works, we may need to trim the memory according to MTRR, right?

That doesn't seem like it's specific to PAT?

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/