RE: [patch 1/1] Do not enforce unique IO_APIC_ID for Xeonprocessorsin EM64T mode (x86_64)

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Fri, 6 May 2005, Protasevich, Natalie wrote:

> Would the APIC version be a good criteria to make a run-time decision
> with Xeons? I know that everything Intel that can run EM64T has front
> side bus (APIC version >= 20?). And I guess the boot parameter can still
> be useful?

 Isn't there a bit in one of the I/O APIC registers which denotes that FSB 
delivery is used?  Hmm, that would be "IO_APIC_reg_00.bits.delivery_type", 
actually...

  Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/