Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/: misc possible cleanups

From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Tue Feb 08 2005 - 20:43:36 EST


On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:18:18AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:

> Hi Adrian,

Hi Armin,

> thanks for the proposed patch.
> Making the functions static is a good idea, I will check and test this.
> Removing some functions, especially from io.* and di.* is not good. These
> functions are mainly used with other sub-drivers which are not part of the
> kernel. I will check if they are some really outdated and the removals in
> message.c.

silly question:
Why are these sub-drivers not included in the kernel?

> Armin

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/