Re: [PATCH 2.4] Wireless Extension v17 (resend)

[Chris Wright]

* Jean Tourrilhes (jt@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 	The first is the handling of spyoffset which is potentially
> unsafe. Unfortunately, the fix involve some API/infrastructure change,
> so is not transparent. Fortunately drivers are clever enough to not
> trigger this bug.
> 	The second is a potential leak of kernel data to user space in
> private handler handling. Few drivers use that feature, there is no
> risk of crash or direct attack, so I would not worry about it.

Hmm, having ability to read kernel data is not so nice.  prism54 uses
this, and is a reasonably popular card.  Looks to me like this should be
plugged.  Is the patch below sufficient? (stolen from full 2.6 patch)

thanks,
-chris

===== net/core/wireless.c 1.4 vs edited =====
--- 1.4/net/core/wireless.c	2003-09-03 04:12:57 -07:00
+++ edited/net/core/wireless.c	2005-02-08 17:45:15 -08:00
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static inline int call_commit_handler(st
 
 /* ---------------------------------------------------------------- */
 /*
- * Number of private arguments
+ * Calculate size of private arguments
  */
 static inline int get_priv_size(__u16	args)
 {
@@ -320,6 +320,24 @@ static inline int get_priv_size(__u16	ar
 	return num * priv_type_size[type];
 }
 
+/* ---------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/*
+ * Re-calculate the size of private arguments
+ */
+static inline int adjust_priv_size(__u16		args,
+				   union iwreq_data *	wrqu)
+{
+	int	num = wrqu->data.length;
+	int	max = args & IW_PRIV_SIZE_MASK;
+	int	type = (args & IW_PRIV_TYPE_MASK) >> 12;
+
+	/* Make sure the driver doesn't goof up */
+	if (max < num)
+		num = max;
+
+	return num * priv_type_size[type];
+}
+
 
 /******************** /proc/net/wireless SUPPORT ********************/
 /*
@@ -701,7 +719,7 @@ static inline int ioctl_private_call(str
 			   ((extra_size + offset) <= IFNAMSIZ))
 				extra_size = 0;
 		} else {
-			/* Size of set arguments */
+			/* Size of get arguments */
 			extra_size = get_priv_size(descr->get_args);
 
 			/* Does it fits in iwr ? */
@@ -731,7 +749,7 @@ static inline int ioctl_private_call(str
 				return -EFAULT;
 
 			/* Does it fits within bounds ? */
-			if(iwr->u.data.length > (descr->set_args &
+			if(iwr->u.data.length > (descr->get_args &
 						 IW_PRIV_SIZE_MASK))
 				return -E2BIG;
 		} else {
@@ -771,6 +789,14 @@ static inline int ioctl_private_call(str
 
 		/* If we have something to return to the user */
 		if (!ret && IW_IS_GET(cmd)) {
+
+			/* Adjust for the actual length if it's variable,
+			 * avoid leaking kernel bits outside. */
+			if (!(descr->get_args & IW_PRIV_SIZE_FIXED)) {
+				extra_size = adjust_priv_size(descr->get_args,
+							      &(iwr->u));
+			}
+
 			err = copy_to_user(iwr->u.data.pointer, extra,
 					   extra_size);
 			if (err)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/