Re: Another trivial orinoco update

[Francois Romieu]

David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> This patch alters the convention with which orinoco_lock() is invoked
> in the orinoco driver.  This should cause no behavioural change, but
> reduces meaningless diffs between the mainline and CVS version of the
> driver.  Another small step towards a merge.

Afaics orinico_lock returns a nice status code. Let alone the merge
argument (which could be solved in the CVS tree as well), is there a
technical reason for this patch ?

--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/