Re: [TRIVIAL] kstrdup

From: Bernd Eckenfels (
Date: Sat Apr 19 2003 - 09:44:12 EST

In article <> you wrote:
> You are arguing over a 1 instruction, probably sub 1 clock scheduling
> matter on a call which is not used on any fast or common path. If you
> shaved 1 clock off the timer handling instead you'd make a lot more
> difference..

i think he is arguing about the performance of strcpy vs. memcpy.

Is the 1 instruction longer including the inlined code for those two?


eckes privat -
Project Freefire -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST