On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:50:31AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Bill Huey (Hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> >> especially given some of the IO performance improvement that
> >> happened as a courtesy of preempt.
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:40:05AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > There is no evidence for any such thing. Nor has any plausible
> > theory been put forward as to why such an improvement should occur.
>
> There's a vague notion in my head that it should decrease scheduling
Vague notions seems to be the level of data on this topic.
-- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com 1+ 505 838 9109- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:19 EST