On 5 Jan 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 12:26, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> > If you look toward the bottom of the second web page that I
> > mentioned in my previous message
> > ( http://www.gcom.com/home/support/whitepapers/linux-gnu-license.html ),
> > you'll see a statement from Alan Cox of June 7, 2001 making a similar
> > point. Here is a URL for the lkml message that that page quoted:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=99193676018831&w=2
>
> Not the gcom response contains fundamental factual errors, it does not for
> example understand how the LGPL/GPL interact
Alan,
Okay, but they had a lawyer draft a position.
Now given that RMS, FSF, et al. are out of the picture, and left to the
domain of the copyright holders, and you have a position of stenght.
Are you going to enforce the copyright on every file you have your name
on, regardless?
If this is the case, then the rest of us sadly have to pick sides.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST