Re: [RFC] [PATCH] subarch cleanup

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 15:27:15 EST

Next message: Doug Ledford: "Re: Compiling x86 with and without frame pointer"
Previous message: Steven Dake: "Re: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver"
In reply to: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] subarch cleanup"
Next in thread: J.E.J. Bottomley: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] subarch cleanup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 19:15, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> mflags-$(CONFIG_MACH_VISWS) := asm/mach-visws
> mflags-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUMMIT) := asm/mach-summit
> mflags-y += asm/mach-generic
> AFLAGS += $(mflags-y)
> CFLAGS += $(mflags-y)
>
> There is something similar done for arm in newest kernel.

-ac already does this for include's so that mach-default is used if the
system doesnt override it

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Doug Ledford: "Re: Compiling x86 with and without frame pointer"
Previous message: Steven Dake: "Re: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver"
In reply to: Sam Ravnborg: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] subarch cleanup"
Next in thread: J.E.J. Bottomley: "Re: [RFC] [PATCH] subarch cleanup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:37 EST