Re: RFC: design for new VM

From: Carrer Yuri (
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 16:07:48 EST

> On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Carrer Yuri wrote:
> > Why kupdate an kflushd are still alive? It should be done
> > without them...
> Since you're not giving any reasons either, let me plainly
> assert that kupdate and kflushd are needed and will stay ;)

 I don't understand why the VM subsystem is the only one to have
 k* threads :-) I mean... what about vfs threads? Why they don't exists?
 :) Can't really the VM done without kupdate an kflushd?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:00:11 EST