Re: RFC: design for new VM

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 13:53:00 EST


On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Carrer Yuri wrote:

> Why kupdate an kflushd are still alive? It should be done
> without them...

Since you're not giving any reasons either, let me plainly
assert that kupdate and kflushd are needed and will stay ;)

Rik

--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
       -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 07 2000 - 21:00:11 EST