On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Replacing is bad... you want to make sure the trap gets exposed again
> when a umount happens, otherwise a manual umount will result in badness.
Fair enough. Anyway, semantics for traps _must_ be different - we just
can't do unions with that sort of stacking (no sane semantics - which
component to stack upon). Traps may be trivially be stackable - that's why
they are there, after all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:22 EST