Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Not yet, but it will go in as soon as the current shitstorm will settle
> down. And with that we couldn't care less for replacement vs. mounting
> atop - automounter would mount at that point anyway and you either get
> the trap replaced with the real tree (the _unmount_ is replaced with
> "mount the trap here and it will replace the tree") or you get the tree
> mounted over trap and umount just exposes the trap again. Both semantics
> are equally usable for direct mounts - no problem with that.
>
Replacing is bad... you want to make sure the trap gets exposed again
when a umount happens, otherwise a manual umount will result in badness.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:22 EST