NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)

From: Tigran Aivazian (tigran@veritas.com)
Date: Mon Jul 24 2000 - 06:20:28 EST

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: What's wrong with IDE patch and what proper solution should be(Re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: VM error? on 2.2.4-test4"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)"
Reply: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)"
Maybe reply: Trond Myklebust: "Re: NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi guys,

Looking at nfs-utils-0.1.9.1/support/nfs/lockdsvc.c:lockdsvc() function I
see that it makes nfsservctl(2) system call with cmd=NFSCTL_LOCKD
(0x10000) and looking at the kernel side in
fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:handle_sys_nfsservctl() I see that it is unimplemented
and so starting /usr/sbin/rpc.lockd rightly returns EINVAL.

Is someone working on implementing it or does one have to start from
scratch today?

Regards,
Tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: What's wrong with IDE patch and what proper solution should be(Re: disk-destroyer.c)"
Previous message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: VM error? on 2.2.4-test4"
Next in thread: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)"
Reply: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)"
Maybe reply: Trond Myklebust: "Re: NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:16 EST