Re: NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)

From: Trond Myklebust (trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no)
Date: Fri Jul 28 2000 - 20:20:55 EST


>>>>> " " == David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> writes:

> trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no said:
>> That's right. The rpc.lockd was a hack to allow NFSroot to
>> mount the root partition with locking enabled, but deferring
>> the startup of the lockd daemon. It was decided to leave it out
>> of the 2.3.x/2.4.x tree.

> In the certain knowledge that anyone with NFSroot wouldn't be
> silly enough to require locking to work correctly? Or is there
> an alternative?

This 'problem' only affects the root partition, so it should hardly be
a major concern. I have planned at some point to implement
   'mount -o remount,lock'
as a remedy, but that will probably require some work on lockd as well
in order to avoid allowing people to play silly buggers with turning
it off while locks are held...

Cheers,
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 21:00:29 EST