[OFFTOPIC] Re: GPL violation is a Linux Community standard

From: david@ultramaster.com
Date: Fri Jun 23 2000 - 09:59:44 EST


Hi "Mr Smith"
You said:
> - Tripwire Security
...
> has also been a perfect
> demostration of a LGPL violation. Previously, there was a number of LGPL
> requirements which where ignored even when notified in writting of them.
> RMS has since contacted them. However, they continue to not provide the
> object files to the demo binaries to allow for relinking against modified
> copies of the LGPL library.

My question is this: if in fact the letter of the law of the LGPL is
followed, doesn't any program that links to glibc need to distribute
re-linkable object files? Wouldn't that include Netscape, Staroffice
and all other Linux programs that run against glibc? After all, these
programs have never been "home-relinkable," so-to-speak.

David

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST