Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: GPL violation is a Linux Community standard

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Fri Jun 23 2000 - 10:23:08 EST


david@ultramaster.com wrote:
> My question is this: if in fact the letter of the law of the LGPL is
> followed, doesn't any program that links to glibc need to distribute
> re-linkable object files? Wouldn't that include Netscape, Staroffice
> and all other Linux programs that run against glibc? After all, these
> programs have never been "home-relinkable," so-to-speak.

Executables that dynamically link. They're already re-linkable object
files aren't they?

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST