Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: GPL violation is a Linux Community standard

From: Jes Sorensen (jes@linuxcare.com)
Date: Fri Jun 23 2000 - 11:26:39 EST


>>>>> "david" == david <david@ultramaster.com> writes:

david> My question is this: if in fact the letter of the law of the
david> LGPL is followed, doesn't any program that links to glibc need
david> to distribute re-linkable object files? Wouldn't that include
david> Netscape, Staroffice and all other Linux programs that run
david> against glibc? After all, these programs have never been
david> "home-relinkable," so-to-speak.

The real question here is actually why someone hiding behind a hotmail
account, without including his real name, posts something like this to
linux-kernel where it is completely off topic. And of course the much
bigger question why some people just have to reply to it? One can only
guess it was a troll.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 21:00:26 EST