Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> > Why wouldn't we move several or most modules in
> > drivers/usb/ and hence /lib/modules/usb/ to their
> > "fuctional" directory, like audio/, video/,
> > net/ (or dev/net/)?
> > Is this better or worse than having many different
> > function-drivers in drivers/usb/ ?
> I think this would be ok _if_ all the USB driver names started with
> "usb-". E.g., acm.o should be renamed usb-acm.o.
I think this will continue to be a problem that crops up, as the number
of subsystems increases. I wonder if this sort of format is
desireable. It does mean deciding on a standard sub-directory in which
all modules of that type will be found:
-- Jeff Garzik | Nothing cures insomnia like the Building 1024 | realization that it's time to get up. MandrakeSoft, Inc. | -- random fortune
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 21:00:14 EST