Re: BitKeeper

From: Steve Dodd (steved@loth.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon Apr 10 2000 - 10:25:10 EST

Next message: Jonathan S. Shapiro: "Re: BitKeeper/DCMS"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture"
In reply to: Jonathan S. Shapiro: "Re: BitKeeper"
Next in thread: Jonathan S. Shapiro: "Re: BitKeeper/DCMS"
Reply: Jonathan S. Shapiro: "Re: BitKeeper/DCMS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 11:14:04AM -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:

> My impression on BitKeeper is that there are three problems:
[..]

> 2. It's not open source.

Can I just ask everyone, please let's not have another BK licensing
fl^Wdiscussion, at least not on l-k. I've set the headers appropriately to
direct follow-ups to the new list..

-- "His mind is like a steel trap -- full of mice"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jonathan S. Shapiro: "Re: BitKeeper/DCMS"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture"
In reply to: Jonathan S. Shapiro: "Re: BitKeeper"
Next in thread: Jonathan S. Shapiro: "Re: BitKeeper/DCMS"
Reply: Jonathan S. Shapiro: "Re: BitKeeper/DCMS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 15 2000 - 21:00:14 EST