Re: Bloat? (khttpd)

Marek Habersack (grendel@vip.net.pl)
Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:59:16 +0100


--at6+YcpfzWZg/htY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Richard Gooch said:

> > Performance, and *modularity*. khttpd doesn't affect anything else in
> > the kernel, and so is a rather harmless optional feature.
>=20
> I've seen this question raised before, but I don't recall seeing a
> definitive answer. How does khttpd compare with phttpd?
And... I'm sorry, but I can't find it - where actually IS phttpd available?

marek

--at6+YcpfzWZg/htY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEAREBAAYFAjhiKrQACgkQq3909GIf5urQkwCgiNOcG83lu2TXYPXNHP0MDwyX
GmsAn2rywkI1wXbm8n5pAKxOzfMoD12D
=nBrQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--at6+YcpfzWZg/htY--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/