* Dwayne C . Litzenberger said:
> > Performance. The apache/khttpd combo beats the shit out of NT in most
> > benchmarks.
>=20
> Maybe so, but why don't we put Quake into the kernel, too? You would get
> great performance, but something like that simply belongs in user space. I
> don't think Linux deserves the benchmarks it gets if it cheats to get
> them. We shouldn't let politics allow us to employ bad design (If a
> registry ala Windows was a performance issue, would we use it? No,
> because it makes a mess of everything).=20
>=20
> An HTTP server is something that should be in a patch, not the main kernel
> tree. (Heck, software suspend and the PC-speaker driver should go in
> before khttpd does.)
Come on, I don't understand the noise. You don't like it, you don't use it.
After all compiling it in is OPTIONAL, right?=20
marek
--bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEAREBAAYFAjhiKmEACgkQq3909GIf5uo+PACdFYnrRDymHHDa86rn1Y1KwzgA
hGoAnjBM+NmmYze8M71UgFNpMi+SqcHI
=zKZ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bKyqfOwhbdpXa4YI--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/