>I'm seeing this here (2.3.20 up to 2.3.31pre1 with jumps between), enough
>to scare me from using 2.3 at all. Strangely, 2.3.20 ran for quite some
>time with a very similar configuration on a plain Pentium without eating
>any filesystems. Recently several people posted their .config files (for
>unrelated reasons), and _noone_ was running a kernel configured for
>i686. Coincidence?
I booted 2.3.31 twice on my 486 laptop and was in it for a total of about
30 minutes. That was long enough for SSH to complain my host key had
changed when I rebooted to 2.2.12. So I don't think it's just i686.
-George Greer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/