Re: 2.3.29: ramdisk still broken.

Khimenko Victor (khim@sch57.msk.ru)
Fri, 26 Nov 1999 09:40:56 +0300 (MSK)


In <Pine.Linu.4.10.9911251630490.389-100000@mikeg.weiden.de> Mike Galbraith (mikeg@weiden.de) wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Tigran Aivazian wrote:

>> On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > The way I see it, the ramdisk used to work by making it's data persistent
>> > in the buffer cache. Today, data doesn't live in the buffer cache, it
>> > lives in the page cache. Ergo, the task at hand is to figure out how
>> > to make data in the page cache persistent rather than copying that data
>> > back and forth.
>>
>> Another view of the situation may be - ramdisk used to be static but then
>> started to rely on buffer cache. Now it can no longer rely on buffer
>> cache. Therefore, shouldn't it go back to being static?

> I did that before trying anything else.. took it out of buffer cache
> all together and used vmalloc instead. Made for a pretty slow ramdisk.

Can you send me that version ? For initrd speed is not an issue: it'll just
need to work somehow. Slow is Ok for initrd...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/