>> If the CONFIG_DEVFS handling is badly implemented, it can screw up other
>> code, even when disabled.
>Check the devfs *code*, Horst. Then tell us CONFIG_DEVFS handling is badly
>implemented. Please don't play these silly theoretical semantics games.
I guess he thinks that since there is (having never looked at devfs) some
chance in his perspective that devfs might be poorly coded, that it's
fundamentally bad. Nevermind the years of testing and code audit by
other kernel hackers, including Ext2-Ted...
-Shawn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/