Re: larger kdev_t, was PUBLIC CHALLENGE...

Martin Dalecki (dalecki@cs.net.pl)
Sat, 09 Oct 1999 13:10:00 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Khimenko Victor: "RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)"
Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "RE: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a"
Maybe in reply to: mike mangino: "larger kdev_t, was PUBLIC CHALLENGE..."

mike mangino wrote:
>
> > I think the main problem is that it's grunt work that no one has
> > volunteered to go and do it. It's not particularly hard, it's just not
> > particularly uplifting.
> >
> I will do these. From the information I've seen, the best thing is probably to use a struct with two 32 bit values in it. Is there agreement in this area? If so, I'll start working this weekend.

I wish you good luck. The dragons are in the details beleve me :-).

--Marcin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Khimenko Victor: "RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)"
Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "RE: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a"
Maybe in reply to: mike mangino: "larger kdev_t, was PUBLIC CHALLENGE..."