Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 14:02:25 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Ford: "Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)"
Previous message: Stephen Frost: "Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device"
In reply to: Shawn Leas: "RE: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a"

On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Exactly! It will _never_ happen that you've got devfsd-2.4.2 with your
> shiny new 2.5.3 kernel, that needs devfsd-2.5.0 at least.

I am thinking of ways that devfsd won't be needed at all...

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Ford: "Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)"
Previous message: Stephen Frost: "Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device"
In reply to: Shawn Leas: "RE: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a"