Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device a lloc ation) )

Theodore Y. Ts'o (tytso@mit.edu)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 13:08:15 -0400


Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 11:27:31 -0400
From: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>

Though luck. Then you must redesign the kernel's guts, and a largeish part
of userspace. And recompile everything with another way of handling
devices, be it 64 bit dev_t's or some other scheme. BTW, the work for
enabling larger dev_t's has been done a long time ago (2.1 something, or
even much earlier). AFAIU, glibc is also prepared for a larger dev_t. The
big problem is doing it, as it will break _everything_.

Actually, it won't break *everything*; since the user-mode side has
already been prepared, it's only an kernel issue, and the number of
places it breaks will be large, but not impossible to do. I suspect a
number of device drivers won't be affected at all --- all it requires is
that the subsystem be written (or rewritten) to use proper macros.

I think the main problem is that it's grunt work that no one has
volunteered to go and do it. It's not particularly hard, it's just not
particularly uplifting.

- Ted

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/