Re: Possible GCC contamination of Linux

Artur Skawina (skawina@geocities.com)
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:27:26 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] hashtable sizes for icache and dcache"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] hashtable sizes for icache and dcache"
Maybe in reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Possible GCC contamination of Linux"
Next in thread: Artur Skawina: "Re: Possible GCC contamination of Linux"

I Lee Hetherington wrote:
>
> If you build gcc with -march=i686, then your libgcc.a will have cmov in
> it. Mine does, but I went out of my way to optimize gcc for i686 since
> that is all I use. Even if you later use -march=i386, you are stuck
> with cmov in your libgcc.a.

Yes, but libgcc.a shouldn't be ending up in the kernel, at least not
on ia32.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] hashtable sizes for icache and dcache"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [patch] hashtable sizes for icache and dcache"
Maybe in reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Possible GCC contamination of Linux"
Next in thread: Artur Skawina: "Re: Possible GCC contamination of Linux"