Fw: Betr.: Re: Betr.: Re: Shortening the Development Cycle...

M.Berglund (mberglund@primelocation.net)
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:04:47 -0400


Well, I am only a lUser who keeps up with what goes on here, but I am
of the opinion that a more diffinitive break between stable and release
might be a good thing. I have to admit, the FreeBSD method is kind of
nice. Certainly is logical from one point of view. I also realise that this
creates a managment situation that may not be easy to deal with.

Food for thought.

M. Berglund

Great, Why don't we take MORE advice from the galactically stupid!
--Tom Cruise

*************************************
Original message from: dstein@phoenixcontact.com
>Ah, excuse me, please. I think missed the original subject of this
message - I
>also subscribed this morning to the list and did not get the first one of
this
>mails.
>
>Of course, new hardware drivers could be best tested within a new
kernel. I
>think, this differences the dev-kernels form the stable ones and of
course it
>makes no sense to include very new drivers into an existing stable
kernel
>release... it maybe rather complicated to difference a kernel
breakdown from a
>driver breakdown, but this might only be a complicated thing to me ;-)
>
>By the way: are my messages in HTML- or plaintext-format? I don't
know, which
>format is used by this browser based notes mailing system, so excuse
any
>HTML-messages - I will correct this if needed.
>
>Dietmar
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/