> > > I was also aware of the earlier RAID thread which was clearly about 2.2.
> > > Actually, Alan included the new RAID code and Linus rejected it.
> >
> > Ok, still the point is that this thread started because of this decision.
> > Sorry if I blamed it on poor Alan...
>
> After we went over it I happen to think Linus was right to reject it. Knfsd
> is less clear - the old knfsd has problems, it is a bug fix. Im reluctant
> to do it for 2.2.13 because with the stuff in the test 2.2.13pre5 it looks
> like a bit of settling time for the fixes then it will be ready.
Sounds reasonable. We need a v2.2.13 out soon, I think, consider the
memory leaks...
> Adding knfsd is going to add a -big- chunk of testing/fallout time.
Hmmm. How about focusing almost exclusively on knfsd for v2.2.14 then?!
/David
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/