Re: file effective and process inheritable mask

Raul Miller (rdm@test.legislate.com)
Sun, 25 Apr 1999 22:18:40 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: bad lmbench numbers for mmap"
Previous message: David C. Davies: "Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #3701"
In reply to: Ravi Wijayaratne: "Double or float in kernel modules"

Albert D. Cahalan <acahalan@cs.uml.edu> wrote:
> The draft is not pure capabilities. You are using the wrong terms again.
>
> a. pure capabilities Something insane, with NO FILESYSTEM NAMESPACE

Actually...

pure capabilities isn't far from the plan9 filesystem semantics.

Pretty cool, actually.

-- Raul

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: bad lmbench numbers for mmap"
Previous message: David C. Davies: "Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #3701"
In reply to: Ravi Wijayaratne: "Double or float in kernel modules"