Re: NT reported faster than Linux 2.2.2 SMP

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 14 Apr 1999 11:27:06 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: Linux vs. tNT ;-) Can sb explain this?"
Previous message: Carlos Costa Portela: "Linux vs. tNT ;-) Can sb explain this?"

> They did have a possibly real problem that was reported (pseudonymously);
> the system was a 4-processor 400 MHz (Xeon) server with 1GB of ram, a RAID
> controller, and six disks, Linux 2.2.2 SMP.

More importantly they carefully went back to 2.2.2 which is the one with
the known performance interactions with NT.

I guess someone at MS did their research 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mitchell Blank Jr: "Re: Linux vs. tNT ;-) Can sb explain this?"
Previous message: Carlos Costa Portela: "Linux vs. tNT ;-) Can sb explain this?"