Re: proper place to discuss kernel 'bloatedness'?
david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
31 Jan 1999 02:58:17 -0800
In article <linux.kernel.19990129230557.S259@perlsupport.com>,
Chip Salzenberg <chip@perlsupport.com> wrote:
>According to Michael Loftis:
>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
>> /dev/hda1 382M 315M 48M 87% /
>>
>> As you can see there's no way Linux could be compiled. This system will be
>> effectively stuck at 2.0.35 forever.
>
>There's no reason you can't compile machine A's kernel on machine B.
Didn't he just say that this was his largest machine?
____
david parsons \bi/ Disk is cheap, but it's not that cheap.
\/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/