Re: 2.2.0pre1 ac1 over ac2

Gregory T. Norris (haphazard@socketis.net)
Wed, 30 Dec 1998 21:33:39 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Damien Miller: "More unresolved symbols in 2.2.0"
Previous message: C S Hendrix: "Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"
In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: short display with 2.1.132-ac3, matroxfb and XF86_SVGA 3.3.3"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2.0pre1 ac1 over ac2"

All of Alan's ac* patches are based on the "pristine" kernel source.
Just apply the ac2 patch... it already contains the contents of ac1.

On Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 11:32:40AM -0200, Alexandre Hautequest wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I've finish to download Alan's 2.2.0pre1 ac1 & 2 patches, and applying
> them (first ac1, then ac2), my patch tells me Reverse (or previously
> appliedd) patch detected! I need to apply ac1 before ac2, or is
> undifferent?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Damien Miller: "More unresolved symbols in 2.2.0"
Previous message: C S Hendrix: "Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"
In reply to: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: short display with 2.1.132-ac3, matroxfb and XF86_SVGA 3.3.3"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.2.0pre1 ac1 over ac2"